Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

Sexual activity and function of adult men with spina bifida

      Summary

      Objective

      Data on sexual function of men with spina bifida (SB) is limited. We aimed to assess sexual activity and erectile dysfunction (ED) in a large international sample of men with SB.

      Methods

      Men with SB (≥18yo) were recruited in an international online survey via clinics and social media. We collected data on demographics, ambulation (Hoffer classification), penile rigidity (Erection Hardness Score), sexual activity and ED (International Index of Erectile Function). Non-parametric tests were used.

      Results

      A total of 162 men (median age 35, 62% shunted, 38% community ambulators) reported sexual desire similar to the general population (p = 0.82), but 55% were dissatisfied with their sex life (Summary Table). Overall, 36% reported full penile rigidity with erections, more commonly with better ambulation (p = 0.01), 69% had ever experienced orgasm and 84% ejaculated. In 44 men (27%) attempting sexual intercourse in the last 4 weeks, 59% had ED (11% severe, 7% moderate, 14% mild-moderate, 27% mild). In this group, 91% of men reporting less than full penile rigidity had ED, compared to 30% with full penile rigidity (p = 0.001). Overall, partnered non-genital contact in the last 3 months was reported by 56%, solo masturbation: 62%, partnered intercourse: 48% (31% vaginal). Of 54 men who used phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5I), 80% reported improved erections, 56% improved intercourse. Overall, 40% reported non-genital erogenous zones as most pleasurable, especially with poorer ambulation (p = 0.002, chest/nipples: 73%).

      Comment

      Strengths of this study include anonymous, voluntary, online participation maximizing participation of a heterogenous, international population. Whenever available, we compared findings to published values for the general population. Since romantic and sexual activity is a complex intersection of interest, opportunity and ability, a more comprehensive assessment was beyond the study's scope. Future work will focus on the interplay with issues like incontinence.

      Conclusions

      Summary TableSexual activity and function.
      Outcome Nonambulators (n = 81) Household ambulators (n = 19) Community ambulators (n = 33) Normal ambulators (n = 29) p-value Overall (n = 162)
      Sexual desire (median, IRQ) (IIEF items 11 and 12) 7 (6–9) 8 (5–9) 7 (6–9) 7 (6–8) 0.97 7 (6–9)
      Overall sex life satisfaction, regardless of sexual activity in the last 4 weeks
      Very satisfied 4 (4.9%) 2 (10.5%) 4 (12.1%) 5 (17.2%) 0.06 15 (9.3%)
      Somewhat satisfied 9 (11.1%) 1 (5.3%) 9 (27.3%) 3 (10.5%) 22 (13.6%)
      Equally satisfied and dissatisfied 14 (17.3%) 2 (10.5%) 3 (9.1%) 5 (17.2%) 24 (14.8%)
      Somewhat dissatisfied 14 (17.3%) 7 (36.8%) 5 (15.2%) 8 (27.6%) 34 (21.0%)
      Very dissatisfied 35 (43.2%) 5 (26.3%) 9 (27.3%) 6 (20.7%) 55 (34.0%)
      Missing 5 (6.2%) 2 (10.5) 3 (9.1%) 2 (6.9%) 12 (7.4%)
      Erection hardness
      Does not get bigger 13 (16.1%) 1 (5.3%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (6.9%) 0.003 16 (9.9%)
      Bigger but not hard 3 (3.7%) 1 (5.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (2.5%)
      Hard but not hard enough for penetration 19 (23.5%) 1 (5.3%) 4 (12.1%) 3 (10.3%) 27 (16.7%)
      Hard enough for penetration but not completely hard 22 (27.2%) 7 (36.8%) 10 (30.5%) 8 (27.6%) 47 (29.0%)
      Completely hard and fully rigid 17 (21.0%) 9 (47.4%) 17 (51.5%) 15 (51.7%) 58 (35.8%)
      Missing 7 (8.6%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (6.1%) 1 (3.5%) 10 (6.2%)
      Romantic and sexual activity in the past 3 months
      Any non-genital partnered contact 36 (44.4%) 10 (52.5) 25 (75.8%) 20 (69.0%) 0.01 91 (56.2%)
      Cuddled 30 (37.0%) 9 (47.4%) 24 (72.7%) 16 (55.2%) 0.01 79 (48.8%)
      Kissed 33 (40.7%) 8 (42.1%) 24 (72.7%) 16 (55.2%) 0.02 81 (50.0%)
      Held hands 35 (43.2%) 10 (52.6%) 25 (75.8%) 19 (65.5%) 0.01 89 (54.9%)
      Masturbated alone 50 (61.7%) 14 (73.7%) 18 (54.6%) 18 (62.1%) 0.62 100 (61.7%)
      Used a sex toy 7 (8.6%) 5 (26.3%) 5 (15.2%) 9 (31.0%) 0.02 26 (16.1%)
      Tested or treated for sexually transmitted infections 2 (2.5%) 1 (5.3%) 1 (3.0%) 3 (10.3%) 0.25 7 (4.3%)
      Any partnered intercourse 29 (35.8%) 6 (31.6%) 24 (72.7%) 18 (62.1%) <0.001 77 (47.5%)
       Touched partner's genitals 26 (32.1%) 6 (31.6%) 24 (72.7%) 17 (58.6%) <0.001 73 (45.1%)
       Partner touched my genitals 21 (25.9%) 6 (31.6%) 22 (66.7%) 16 (55.2%) <0.001 65 (40.1%)
       Gave oral sex 16 (19.8%) 4 (21.1%) 17 (51.5%) 16 (55.2%) <0.001 53 (32.7%)
       Received oral sex 16 (19.8%) 5 (26.3%) 13 (39.4%) 15 (51.7%) 0.01 49 (30.3%)
       Vaginal sex 12 (14.8%) 4 (21.1%) 19 (57.6%) 15 (51.7%) <0.001 50 (30.9%)
       Anal sex 5 (6.2%) 1 (5.3%) 2 (6.1%) 6 (20.7%) 0.12 14 (8.6%)
      Median age at first sexual contact (IQR) 18 (16–25) 18.5 (16–26) 19 (18–25) 20 (17–25.5) 0.63 19 (16–25)
      Full Table available in the Online Appendix.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      SB (spina bifida), ED (erectile dysfunction), EHS (Erection Hardness Score), IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function), PDE5I (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Boulet S.L.
        • Yang Q.
        • Mai C.
        • Kirby R.S.
        • Collins J.S.
        • Robbins J.M.
        • et al.
        Trends in the postfortification prevalence of spina bifida and anencephaly in the United States.
        Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008; 82: 527-532https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20468
      1. Bong GW, Rovner ES. Sexual health in adult men with spina bifida. Sci World J 2007;7:1466–1469. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.191.

        • Glass C.
        • Soni B.
        ABC of sexual health: sexual problems of disabled patients.
        BMJ. 1999; 318: 518-521https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7182.518
        • Heller M.K.
        • Gambino S.
        • Church P.
        • Lindsay S.
        • Kaufman M.
        • McPherson A.C.
        Sexuality and relationships in young people with spina bifida and their partners.
        J Adolesc Health. 2016; 59: 182-188https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.037
        • Verhoef M.
        • Barf H.A.
        • Vroege J.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • Gooskens R.H.
        • et al.
        Sex education, relationships, and sexuality in young adults with spina bifida.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 979-987https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.042
        • Sawyer S.M.
        • Roberts K.V.
        Sexual and reproductive health in young people with spina bifida.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999; 41 (S0012162299001383)https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162299001383
        • Akre C.
        • Light A.
        • Sherman L.
        • Polvinen J.
        • Rich M.
        What young people with spina bifida want to know about sex and are not being told.
        Child Care Health Dev. 2015; 41: 963-969https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12282
        • Murray C.B.
        • Lennon J.M.
        • Devine K.A.
        • Holmbeck G.N.
        • Klages K.
        • Potthoff L.M.
        The influence of social adjustment on normative and risky health behaviors in emerging adults with spina bifida.
        Health Psychol. 2014; 33: 1153-1163https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000050
        • Linstow M.
        • Biering-Sã¸rensen I.
        • Liebach A.
        • Lind M.
        • Seitzberg A.
        • Hansen R.
        • et al.
        Spina bifida and sexuality.
        J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46: 891-897https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1863
        • Cardenas D.D.
        • Topolski T.D.
        • White C.J.
        • McLaughlin J.F.
        • Walker W.O.
        Sexual functioning in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 31-35https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.124
        • Lassmann J.
        • Garibay Gonzalez F.
        • Melchionni J.B.
        • Pasquariello P.S.
        • Snyder H.M.
        Sexual function in adult patients with spina bifida and its impact on quality of life.
        J Urol. 2007; 178: 1611-1614https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.162
        • Valtonen K.
        • Karlsson A.-K.
        • Siösteen A.
        • Dahlöf L.-G.
        • Viikari-Juntura E.
        Satisfaction with sexual life among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury and meningomyelocele.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 965-976https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500404362
      2. Gamé X, Moscovici J, Gamé L. Evaluation of sexual function in young men with spina bifida and myelomeningocele using the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology n.d.;67:566–570.

        • Shiomi T.
        • Hirayama A.
        • Fujimoto K.
        • Hirao Y.
        Sexuality and seeking medical help for erectile dysfunction in young adults with spina bifida.
        Int J Urol. 2006; 13: 1323-1326https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01559.x
        • Sandler A.D.
        • Worley G.
        • Leroy E.C.
        • Stanley S.D.
        • Kalman S.
        Sexual function and erection capability among young men with spina bifida.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008; 38: 823-829https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15117.x
        • Hirayama A.
        • Yamada K.
        • Tanaka Y.
        • Hirata N.
        • Yamamoto M.
        • Suemori T.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of sexual function in adults with myelomeningocele.
        Hinyokika Kiyo. 1995; 41: 985-989
        • Diamond D.A.
        • Rickwood A.M.K.
        • Thomas D.G.
        Penile erections in myelomeningocele patients.
        Br J Urol. 1986; 58: 434-435https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1986.tb09099.x
        • Cass A.S.
        • Bloom B.A.
        • Luxenberg M.
        Sexual function in adults with myelomeningocele.
        J Urol. 1986; 136: 425-426https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)44891-9
        • Decter R.M.
        • Furness P.D.
        • Nguyen T.A.
        • McGowan M.
        • Laudermilch C.
        • Telenko A.
        Reproductive understanding, sexual functioning and testosterone levels in men with spina bifida.
        J Urol. 1997; 157: 1466-1468https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65025-0
        • Palmer J.S.
        • Kaplan W.E.
        • Firlit C.F.
        Erectile dysfunction in patients with spina bifida is a treatable condition.
        J Urol. 2000; : 958-961https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200009020-00009
        • Choi E.K.
        • Ji Y.
        • Han S.W.
        Sexual function and quality of life in young men with spina bifida: could it Be neglected aspects in clinical practice?.
        Urology. 2017; 108: 225-232https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.052
        • Streur C.S.
        • Corona L.
        • Smith J.E.
        • Lin M.
        • Wiener J.S.
        • Wittmann D.A.
        Sexual function of men and women with spina bifida: a scoping literature review.
        Sex Med Rev. 2021; 9: 244-266https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.09.001
        • Szymanski K.M.
        • Hensel D.J.
        • Wiener J.S.
        • Whittam B.
        • Cain M.P.
        • Misseri R.
        Sexual identity and orientation in adult men and women with spina bifida.
        J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017; 10: 313-317https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-170462
      3. Kincaid JP,L Jr F, Rogers RL. Derivation of New readability formulas (automated readability Index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula. For navy enlisted personnel n.d.;1975:1–48.

        • Hoffer M.M.
        • Feiwell E.
        • Perry R.
        • Perry J.
        • Bonnett C.
        Functional ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973; 55: 137-148
        • Sawin K.J.
        • Liu T.
        • Ward E.
        • Thibadeau J.
        • Schechter M.S.
        • Soe M.M.
        • et al.
        The national spina bifida patient Registry: profile of a large cohort of participants from the first 10 clinics.
        J Pediatr. 2015; 166: 444-450.e1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.039
        • Mulhall J.P.
        • Goldstein I.
        • Bushmakin A.G.
        • Cappelleri J.C.
        • Hvidsten K.
        Validation of the erection hardness score.
        J Sex Med. 2007; 4: 1626-1634https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00600.x
        • Rosen R.C.
        • Riley A.
        • Wagner G.
        • Osterloh I.H.
        • Kirkpatrick J.
        • Mishra A.
        The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction.
        Urology. 1997; 49: 822-830https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0
        • Cappelleri J.C.
        • Rosen R.C.
        • Smith M.D.
        • Mishra A.
        • Osterloh I.H.
        Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function.
        Urology. 1999; 54: 346-351https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00099-0
        • Lee N.G.
        • Andrews E.
        • Rosoklija I.
        • Logvinenko T.
        • Johnson E.K.
        • Oates R.D.
        • et al.
        The effect of spinal cord level on sexual function in the spina bifida population.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11: 142.e1-142.e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.02.010
        • Joyner B.
        • McLorie G.
        • Khoury A.
        Sexuality and reproductive issues in children with myelomeningocele.
        Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 8: 29-34https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1071115
        • Hughes T.L.
        • Simmons K.L.
        • Tejwani R.
        • Barton K.D.
        • Wiener J.S.
        • Todd Purves J.
        • et al.
        Sexual function and dysfunction in individuals with spina bifida: a systematic review.
        Urology. 2021; 156: 308-319https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.042
        • Roth J.D.
        • Spinoit A.-F.
        • Hoebeke P.
        Sexual function and dysfunction in men with spina bifida.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17: 158-165https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.021
        • Roth J.D.
        • Misseri R.
        • Cain M.P.
        • Szymanski K.M.
        Mobility, hydrocephalus and quality of erections in men with spina bifida.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13: 264.e1-264.e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.12.004
        • Gatti C.
        • del Rossi C.
        • Ferrari A.
        • Casolari E.
        • Casadio G.
        • Scire G.
        Predictors of successful sexual partnering of adults with spina bifida.
        J Urol. 2009; 182: 1911-1916https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.065
        • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine
        Sexuality and reproductive health in adults with spinal cord injury: what you should know.
        Paralyzed Veterans of America. 2011; : 1-52
        • Zhang H.
        • Li B.
        Male genital sensation after spinal cord injury: a review.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2020; 9: 1382-1393https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-19-829
      4. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine: Sexuality and reproductive health in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med n.d.;33:281–336.