Advertisement
Letter to the Editor|Articles in Press

Fragility index of meta-analyses and randomized-controlled trials on the efficacy of caudal block for hypospadias: Is the glass half-full or half-empty?

  • Sachit Anand
    Affiliations
    All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • Luis H. Braga
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: Department of Surgery/Urology - Departments of Pediatrics and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact - McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital - McMaster Urology Residency Program - McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (MPSRC) - Pediatric Urologists of Canada (PUC) McMaster University 1200 Main Street West, 4E19 Hamilton Health Science (HHS) - L8S4J9 Hamilton - Ontario - Canada
    Affiliations
    McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 14, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.02.005
      Giving caudal-epidural block (CEB) is a common practice by pediatric anesthesiologists during hypospadias repair. It provides adequate intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. However, several studies have questioned its safety in terms of increased incidence of postoperative complications.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Goel P.
        • Jain S.
        • Bajpai M.
        • Khanna P.
        • Jain V.
        • Yadav D.K.
        Does caudal analgesia increase the rates of urethrocutaneous fistula formation after hypospadias repair? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Indian J Urol. 2019; 35: 222-229https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_252_18
        • Tanseco P.P.
        • Randhawa H.
        • Chua M.E.
        • Blankstein U.
        • Kim J.K.
        • McGrath M.
        • et al.
        Postoperative com- plications of hypospadias repair in patients receiving caudal block vs. non-caudal anes- thesia: a meta-analysis.
        Can Urol Assoc J Z J l’Association Des Urol Du Canada. 2018; 13: E249e57https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5688
        • Zhu C.
        • Wei R.
        • Tong Y.
        • Liu J.
        • Song Z.
        • Zhang S.
        Analgesic efficacy and impact of caudal block on surgical complications of hypo- spadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019; 44: 259e67https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-000022
        • Adler A.C.
        • Bhatia V.P.
        • Chandrakantan A.
        • Nathanson B.H.
        • Ouellette L.
        • Austin P.F.
        Association of analgesic block with the incidence of complications following hypospadias surgery; A meta-analysis.
        Urology. 2022; 166: 11e7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.03.002
        • Kundra P.
        • Yuvaraj K.
        • Agrawal K.
        • Krishnappa S.
        • Kumar L.T.
        Surgical outcome in children undergoing hypospadias repair under caudal epidural vs penile block.
        Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22: 707-712https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03702.x