Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

What is the angle of a banana? The difficulty in reliable assessment of hypospadias chordee

Published:February 07, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.02.003

      Summary

      Introduction

      The degree of chordee associated with hypospadias impacts operative management. Unfortunately, poor inter-observer reliability in assessing chordee by multiple methods in vitro has been demonstrated. This variability may be related to the fact that chordee is not a discrete angle, but rather an arc-like curvature similar to that of a banana. On an attempt to improve this variability, we assessed the inter-rater reliability of a novel method of chordee measurement and compared it to measurements with a goniometer both in vitro and in vivo.

      Materials and methods

      In vitro assessment of curvature was performed using 5 bananas. In vivo chordee measurement was performed during 43 hypospadias repairs. On in vitro and in vivo cases, chordee was assessed independently by faculty and resident physicians. Angle assessment was performed in a standard manner with a goniometer and with a smartphone app using ruler measurements of the length and width of the arc (Summary Figure). The proximal and distal aspect of the arc to be measured was marked on the bananas, whereas the penile measurements were taken from the penoscrotal to the sub-coronal junctions.

      Results

      In vitro banana assessment demonstrated strong intra- and inter-rater reliability for length (0.89 and 0.88, respectively) and width measurements (0.97 and 0.96). The calculated angle demonstrated an intra- and inter-rater reliability of 0.67 and 0.67. The banana goniometer/protractor measurements were weak with an intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of 0.33 and 0.21. With hypospadias chordee, the inter-rater reliability was strong for length and width measurements (0.95 and 0.94) and 0.48 for calculated angle. The inter-rater reliability of the goniometer angle was 0.96. Further assessment of inter-rater goniometer reliability was performed relative to degree of chordee as characterized by faculty. The inter-rater reliability for ≤15°, 16–30, and ≥30° was 0.68 (n = 20), 0.34 (n = 14), and 0.90 (n = 9), respectively. When the goniometer angle was classified as ≤15, 16–30, or ≥30° by one physician, it was classified outside of this range by the other physician 23%, 47%, and 25% of the time, respectively.

      Discussion

      Our data demonstrate significant limitations of the goniometer for assessing chordee in vitro and in vivo. We were unable to demonstrate significant improvement in chordee assessment using arc length and width measurements to calculate radians.

      Conclusions

      Summary Figure
      Graphical AbstractThe length and width of an arc.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Abbas T.O.
        Evaluation of penile curvature in patients with hypospadias; gaps in the current practice and future perspectives.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2022; 18: 151-159https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.12.015
        • Bologna R.A.
        • Noah T.A.
        • Nasrallah P.F.
        • McMahon D.R.
        Chordee: varied opinions and treatments as documented in a survey of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section of Urology.
        Urol. 1999; 53: 608-612https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00656-6
        • Pippi Salle J.L.
        • Sayed S.
        • Salle A.
        • Bagli D.
        • Farhat W.
        • Koyle M.
        • et al.
        Proximal hypospadias: a persistent challenge. Single institution outcome analysis of three surgical techniques over a 10-year period.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12: 28.e1-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.06.011
        • Snodgrass W.
        • Bush N.
        Staged tubularized autograft repair for primary proximal hypospadias with 30-degree or greater ventral curvature.
        J Urol. 2017; 198: 680-686https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.019
        • Villanueva C.A.
        Goniometer not better than unaided visual inspection at estimating ventral penile curvature on plastic models.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2019; 15: 628-633https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.020
        • Villanueva C.A.
        Ventral penile curvature estimation using an app.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16: 437.e1-437.e3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.027
        • Mosa H.
        • Paul A.
        • Solomon E.
        • Garriboli M.
        How accurate is eyeball measurement of curvature? A tool for hypospadias surgery.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.04.009
        • McVeigh K.H.
        • Murray P.M.
        • Heckman M.G.
        • Rawal B.
        • Peterson J.J.
        Accuracy and validity of goniometer and visual assessments of angular joint positions of the hand and wrist.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: e21-e35https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.014
        • Storm D.W.
        • Lockwood G.M.
        • Bonnett M.A.
        • Cooper B.J.
        • Harris L.M.
        • Cooper C.S.
        The impact of perioperative and operative variables on early postoperative complications following primary hypospadias repair.
        Urology. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.002
        • Merriman L.S.
        • Arlen A.M.
        • Broecker B.H.
        • Smith E.A.
        • Kirsch A.J.
        • Elmore J.M.
        The GMS hypospadias score: assessment of inter-observer reliability and correlation with post-operative complications.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9: 707-712https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.04.006

      Linked Article