Advertisement

Contralateral testicular hypertrophy is associated with a higher incidence of absent testis in children with non-palpable testis

Published:November 12, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.11.006

      Summary

      Background and objective

      The objective of our study is to examine the impact of monorchism on contralateral testicular size in children with non-palpable testis (NPT). Enhanced contralateral testicular volume or longitudinal diameter (length) serves as a predictor of monorchism. In the present study, we assessed the ability of ultrasound measured enlarged contralateral testicular length for predicting monorchism (and hence a testicular nubbin) in children with NPT. Furthermore, we evaluated the general prevalence of viable versus non-viable testes in patients referred to our institution with unilateral undescended testis between 2005 and 2020.

      Study design

      We analysed the records of 54 patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for NPT between 2005 and 2020 in a European tertiary care centre. Testicular lengths (longitudinal diameter) and testicular volume of the contralateral testis, as well as surgeon (surgeon 1 vs surgeon 2 vs others) and age at surgery (months) were assessed and stratified according to intraoperative findings (presence or absence of a testicular nubbin). Testicular length and volume were evaluated by ultrasound examination in office prior to surgery. Chi-square and t-test for descriptive analyses as well as uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using R Version 3.1.0 (R Project for Statistical Computing, www.R-project.org).

      Results

      A total of 15 children presented with viable testes and 39 patients with testicular nubbin. Mean age was 20.5 months in the overall cohort and 22.6 vs 19.7 months in children with viable testis vs testicular nubbin (p = 0.4). In patients with presence of a testicular nubbin, the contralateral testis was larger (median length 17 mm (16–19.2)) as compared to patients with a viable testis (median length 15 mm (14-17), p = 0.001). Similarly, contralateral testicular volume was lower in patients with a present viable testis (0.6 ccm vs 0.8 ccm; p < 0–001). This effect remained statistically significant when logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age and weight at surgery, year of surgery, surgeon, and laterality. OR (odds ratio) for presence of a testicular nubbin was 1.6 (per mm) [95% CI (confidence interval) 1.13–2.17; p = 0.007].

      Conclusion

      Summary TableMultivariable logistic regression analysis in 54 patients with non-palpable testis with the endpoint presence of testicular nubbin
      Multivariate Analysis OR (95% CI) p value
      Age at surgery (months) 0.97 (0.92–1.03) 0.3
      Weight at surgery (kg) 1.19 (0.72–1.98) 0.5
      Surgeon
       Surgeon 1 1.00 (Ref.)
       Surgeon 2 0.23 (0.04–1.27) 0.09
       Others 1.97 (0.17–23.34) 0.6
      Side
       Left 1.00 (Ref.)
       Right 0.46 (0.09–2.41) 0.4
      Testicular length (mm) 1.57 (1.13–2.17) 0.007

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Barthold J.S.
        • GonzÁLez R.
        The epidemiology of congenital cryptorchidism, testicular ascent and orchiopexy.
        J Urol. 2003; 170: 2396-2401
        • Scorer C.G.
        The descent of the testis.
        Arch Dis Child. 1964; 39: 605-609
        • Thong M.-K.
        • Lim C.-T.
        • Fatimah H.
        Undescended testes: incidence in 1,002 consecutive male infants and outcome at 1 year of age.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 1998; 13: 37-41
        • Scorer C.
        The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at birth.
        Arch Dis Child. 1956; 31: 198
        • Levitt S.B.
        • Kogan S.J.
        • Engel R.M.
        • Weiss R.M.
        • Martin D.C.
        • Ehrlich R.M.
        The impalpable testis: a rational approach to management.
        J Urol. 1978; 120: 515-520
        • Hrebinko R.L.
        • Bellinger M.F.
        The limited role of imaging techniques in managing children with undescended testes.
        J Urol. 1993; 150: 458-460
        • Wolverson M.K.
        • Houttuin E.
        • Heiberg E.
        • Sundaram M.
        • Shields J.
        Comparison of computed tomography with high-resolution real-time ultrasound in the localization of the impalpable undescended testis.
        Radiology. 1983; 146: 133-136
        • Moore R.G.
        • Peters C.A.
        • Bauer S.B.
        • Mandell J.
        • Retik A.B.
        Laparoscopic evaluation of the nonpalpable testis: a prospective assessment of accuracy.
        J Urol. 1994; 151: 728-731
        • Patil K.K.
        • Green J.S.
        • Duffy P.G.
        Laparoscopy for impalpable testes.
        BJU Int. 2005; 95: 704-708
        • Laron Z.
        • Zilka E.
        Compensatory hypertrophy of testicle in unilateral cryptorchidism.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 1969; 29: 1409-1413
        • Mesrobian H.G.
        • Chassaignac J.
        • Laud P.
        The presence or absence of an impalpable testis can be predicted from clinical observations alone.
        BJU Int. 2002; 90: 97-99
        • Hurwitz R.S.
        • Kaptein J.S.
        How well does contralateral testis hypertrophy predict the absence of the nonpalpable testis?.
        J Urol. 2001; 165: 588-592
        • Koff S.A.
        Does compensatory testicular enlargement predict monorchism?.
        J Urol. 1991; 146: 632-633
        • Huff D.S.
        • Snyder H.M.
        • Hadziselimovic F.
        • Blyth B.
        • Duckett J.W.
        An absent testis is associated with contralateral testicular hypertrophy.
        J Urol. 1992; 148: 627-628
        • Snodgrass W.T.
        • Yucel S.
        • Ziada A.
        Scrotal exploration for unilateral nonpalpable testis.
        J Urol. 2007; 178: 1718-1721
        • Braga L.H.
        • Kim S.
        • Farrokhyar F.
        • Lorenzo A.J.
        Is there an optimal contralateral testicular cut-off size that predicts monorchism in boys with nonpalpable testicles?.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 693-698
        • Son H.S.
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Im Y.J.
        • Kim S.W.
        • Chi B.H.
        • Han S.W.
        Can hypertrophy of the contralateral testis predict the absence of a viable testis in infancy with cryptorchidism: a prospective analysis.
        PLoS One. 2016; 110151528
        • Shadpour P.
        • Kashi A.H.
        • Arvin A.
        Scrotal testis size in unilateral non-palpable cryptorchidism, what it can and cannot tell: study of a Middle Eastern population.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13: 268-e1
        • Fuse H.
        • Takahara M.
        • Ishii H.
        • Sumiya H.
        • Shimazaki J.
        Measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography.
        Int J Androl. 1990; 13: 267-272
        • Huang Y.
        • Liu P.
        • Sun N.
        • Zhang W.
        • Song H.
        Detection of monorchidism in boys with unilateral undescended testes: clinical benefits and limitations of contralateral testicular size.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16: 356.e1-356.e6
        • Hodhod A.
        • Capolicchio J.P.
        • Jednak R.
        • El-Sherbiny M.
        Testicular hypertrophy as a predictor for contralateral monorchism: retrospective review of prospectively recorded data.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12: 34-e1
        • Cendron M.
        • Shned A.R.
        • Ellsworth P.I.
        Histological Evaluation of the testicular nubbin in the vanishing testis syndrome.
        J Urol. 1998; 160 (discussion 1163): 1161-1162
        • Elder J.
        Laparoscopy for impalpable testes: significance of the patent processus vaginalis.
        J Urol. 1994; 152: 776-778
        • Ueda N.
        • Shiroyanagi Y.
        • Suzuki H.
        • Kim W.J.
        • Yamazaki Y.
        • Tanaka Y.
        The value of finding a closed internal ring on laparoscopy in unilateralnonpalpable testis.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 542-546
        • Rozanski T.A.
        • Wojno K.J.
        • Bloom D.A.
        The remnant orchiectomy the.
        J Urol. 1996; 155 (discussion 714): 712-713
        • Radmayr C.
        • Oswald J.
        • Schwentner C.
        • Neururer R.
        • Peschel R.
        • Bartsch G.
        Long-term outcome of laparoscopically managed nonpalpable testes.
        J Urol. 2003; 170: 2409-2411
        • Ismail K.
        • Ashour M.
        • El-Afifi M.
        • Hashish A.
        • El-Dosouky N.
        • Nagm M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopy in the management of impalpable testis: series of 64 cases.
        World J Surg. 2009; 33: 1514-1519
        • Papparella A.
        • Romano M.
        • Noviello C.
        • Cobellis G.
        • Nino F.
        • Del Monaco C.
        • et al.
        The value of laparoscopy in the management of non-palpable testis.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2010; 6: 550-554
        • Park J.H.
        • Park Y.H.
        • Park K.
        • Choi H.
        Diagnostic laparoscopy for the management of impalpable testes.
        Korean J Urol. 2011; 52: 355-358
        • Kolon T.F.
        • Herndon C.A.
        • Baker L.A.
        • Baskin L.S.
        • Baxter C.G.
        • Cheng E.Y.
        • et al.
        Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism: AUA guideline.
        J Urol. 2014; 192: 337-345
        • Radmayr C.
        • Dogan H.S.
        • Hoebeke P.
        • Kocvara R.
        • Nijman R.
        • Stein R.
        • et al.
        Management of undescended testes: European association of urology/European society for paediatric urology guidelines.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12: 335-343