Advertisement

Commentary to A patient- and parent-centered approach to urinary and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents with spina bifida: understanding experiences in the context of other competing care issues. JPU in press

Published:November 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.11.001
      The utilization of a qualitative research approach integrated with human centered design methods in understanding the sequel of incontinence secondary to spina bifida (SB) represents a novel approach to treatment. The use of mind, challenge and experience mapping is intriguing and “shines light’ on connections which may otherwise have gone unnoticed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Szymanski KM, Misseri R, Carroll AE, et al. A patient- and parent-centered approach to urinary and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents with spina bifida: understanding experiences in the context of other competing care issues. JPU in press.

        • Lemelle J.L.
        • Guillemin F.
        • Aubert D.
        • Guys J.M.
        • Lottmann H.
        • Lortat-Jacob S.
        • Mouriquand P.
        • Ruffion A.
        • Moscovici J.
        • Schmitt M.
        Quality of life and continence in patients with spina bifida.
        Quality of Life Research. 2006; 15: 1481-1492
      2. MacNeily AE, Jafari S, Scott h, Dalgetty A, Afshar K. Health related quality of life in patients with spina bifida: a prospective assessment before and after lower urinary tract reconstruction. 2009; 182:1984-1992.

      Linked Article