Advertisement

A patient- and parent-centered approach to urinary and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents with spina bifida: understanding experiences in the context of other competing care issues

Published:October 21, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.10.027

      Summary

      Introduction

      Despite significant and known challenges to urinary and fecal incontinence (UI and FI, respectively) among children with spina bifida (SB) and their families, few studies have identified patient-centered measures and approaches to assessing them. This study represents the first stage of a larger study to develop a patient-centered goal-setting tool to guide incontinence management (Figure). Our aim was to understand patient experiences of UI and FI, and what goals should be included in the tool.

      Methods

      We used a qualitative research approach integrated with human-centered design methods. We recruited, in clinic and online, children with SB (8–17 years old) and parents (>=18 years old) of children with SB (8–17 years old). Online activities were analyzed by four experienced design researchers using affinity diagramming, group analysis and modeling activities (mind maps, challenge maps, experience maps). Recruitment and thematic qualitative analysis continued until saturation was reached.

      Results

      Seventeen children with SB participated (9 female, 12 shunted, 13 using bladder catheterizations, 6 using Malone antegrade continence enema, median age: 15 years old). Fifteen parents participated (13 mothers/2 fathers, median age: 42 years old), including six mother-child dyads. Five major themes each were identified for UI and FI experiences: (1) negative emotional impact of incontinence, (2) unpredictability of incontinence, (3) challenging/unpleasant incontinence management, (4) inconvenient/unreliable incontinence management, (5) UI management having unpleasant complications and FI putting much responsibility on parents. We identified six UI goal domains and five FI goal domains. Four overlapping domains included: accidents, independence, interruptions at school and social/friends. Unique domains were: urinary tract infections (UI), catheterizations (UI) and enemas (FI).

      Comment

      Findings of our study improve our understanding of children’s and parents’ experiences associated with incontinence in SB and potential continence goals.

      Conclusions

      Summary Figure
      Graphical AbstractOverview of the MyGoal-C tool research aims and stages, with the current paper addressing Aim 1.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations::

      SB (spina bifida), SDM (shared decision making), HRQOL (health-related quality of life), RJ (Research Jam), FI (fecal incontinence), UI (urinary incontinence)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Malone P.S.
        • Wheeler R.A.
        • Williams J.E.
        Continence in patients with spina bifida: long term results.
        Arch Dis Child. 1994; 70: 107-110
        • Szymanski K.M.
        • Cain M.P.
        • Whittam B.
        • Kaefer M.
        • Rink R.C.
        • Misseri R.
        All incontinence is not created equal: impact of urinary and fecal incontinence on quality of life in adults with spina bifida.
        J Urol. 2017; 197: 885-891https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.117
        • Szymanski K.M.
        • Misseri R.
        • Whittam B.
        • Yang D.Y.
        • Raposo S.M.
        • King S.J.
        • et al.
        Quality of life assessment in spina bifida for children (QUALAS-C): development and validation of a novel health-related quality of life instrument.
        Urology. 2016; 87: 178-184https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.027
        • Szymanski K.M.
        • Misseri R.
        • Whittam B.
        • Casey J.T.
        • Yang D.Y.
        • Raposo S.M.
        • et al.
        Validation of QUALAS-T, a health-related quality of life instrument for teenagers with spina bifida.
        Cent European J Urol. 2017; 70: 306-313https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2017.1195
        • Snow-Lisy D.C.
        • Yerkes E.B.
        • Cheng E.Y.
        Update on urological management of spina bifida from prenatal diagnosis to adulthood.
        J Urol. 2015; 194: 288-296https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.107
        • Lloyd J.C.
        • Nseyo U.
        • Madden-Fuentes R.J.
        • Ross S.S.
        • Wiener J.S.
        • Routh J.C.
        Reviewing definitions of urinary continence in the contemporary spina bifida literature: a call for clarity.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9: 567-574https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.02.006
        • Sawin K.J.
        • Bellin M.H.
        Quality of life in individuals with spina bifida: a research update.
        Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010; 16: 47-59https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.96
        • Kiresuk T.J.
        • Smith A.
        • Cardillo J.E.
        Goal Attainment Scaling : applications, theory, and measurement.
        L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.1994
        • Reuben D.B.
        • Tinetti M.E.
        Goal-oriented patient care--an alternative health outcomes paradigm.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 777-779https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1113631
        • Hullfish K.L.
        • Bovbjerg V.E.
        • Gurka M.J.
        • Steers W.D.
        Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction: patient centered goals at 1 year.
        J Urol. 2008; 179 (discussion 5): 2280-2285https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.147
        • Anderson C.B.
        • Rapkin B.
        • Reaves B.C.
        • Sun A.J.
        • Morganstern B.
        • Dalbagni G.
        • et al.
        Idiographic quality of life assessment before radical cystectomy.
        Psycho Oncol. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4025
        • Vroland-Nordstrand K.
        • Eliasson A.C.
        • Jacobsson H.
        • Johansson U.
        • Krumlinde-Sundholm L.
        Can children identify and achieve goals for intervention? A randomized trial comparing two goal-setting approaches.
        Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12925
        • Missiuna C.
        • DeMatteo C.
        • Hanna S.
        • Mandich A.
        • Law M.
        • Mahoney W.
        • et al.
        Exploring the use of cognitive intervention for children with acquired brain injury.
        Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010; 30: 205-219https://doi.org/10.3109/01942631003761554
        • Speth L.
        • Janssen-Potten Y.
        • Rameckers E.
        • Defesche A.
        • Winkens B.
        • Becher J.
        • et al.
        Effects of botulinum toxin A and/or bimanual task-oriented therapy on upper extremity activities in unilateral Cerebral Palsy: a clinical trial.
        BMC Neurol. 2015; 15: 143https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0404-3
        • Giacomin J.
        What is human centred design?.
        Des J. 2014; 17: 606-623https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480186
        • Sanematsu H.
        • Wiehe S.
        Learning to look: design in health services research.
        Touchpoint. 2014; (July): TP06-TP82
        • Domecq J.P.
        • Prutsky G.
        • Elraiyah T.
        • Wang Z.
        • Nabhan M.
        • Shippee N.
        • et al.
        Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-89
        • Sanematsu H.
        • Wiehe S.
        How do you do? Design research methods and the "hows" of community based participatory research.
        in: McTavis L. Brett-MacLean P. Insight 2: Engaging the health humanities. University of Alberta Department of Art & Design, Alberta, CA2013
        • Sanematsu H.
        53. Fun with Facebook: the impact of focus groups on the development of awareness campaigns for adolescent health.
        J Adolesc Health. 2011; 48: S44-S45
        • Kolko J.
        Exposing the Magic of Design: A Practitioner's Guide to the Methods & Theory of Synthesis.
        Oxford University Press, New York, NY2011
        • Basadur M.
        • Ellspermann S.J.
        • Evans G.W.
        A new methodology for formulating ill-structured problems.
        Omega. 1994; 22: 627-645https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(94)90053-1
        • AdaptivePath
        Adaptive Path's Guide to Experience Mapping.
        Adaptive Path, San Francisco, CA2013
        • Szymanski K.M.
        • Cain M.P.
        • Whittam B.
        • Kaefer M.
        • Rink R.C.
        • Misseri R.
        Incontinence affects health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with spina bifida.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2018; 14 (279 e1- e8)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.02.021
        • Szymanski K.M.
        • Misseri R.
        • Whittam B.
        • Kaefer M.
        • Rink R.C.
        • Cain M.P.
        Quantity, not frequency, predicts bother with urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life in adults with spina bifida.
        J Urol. 2016; 195: 1263-1269https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.108

      Linked Article