Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 19, ISSUE 1, P88.e1-88.e8, February 2023

Risk factors for postoperative adverse outcomes and secondary surgery in pediatric patients with unilateral ectopic ureterocele associated with the duplex system

  • Xiaoming Yin
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, Liaoning province 110004, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yi Yang
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Yi Yang, No.36 Sanhao Street, Heping district, Shenyang city, Liaoning province 110004, China. Tel.: +860249661557411; Fax: +8602464653696
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, Liaoning province 110004, China
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 18, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.10.022

      Summary

      Introduction

      Ectopic ureterocele management in children remains a controversial subject without a clear consensus. The purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors for adverse outcomes and secondary surgery in pediatric patients with unilateral ectopic duplex system ureterocele, a complex urinary system deformity with controversial treatment.

      Materials and methods

      We retrospectively reviewed 75 patients with unilateral ectopic duplex system ureterocele who underwent surgery at the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between January 1, 2008, and September 31, 2020. Demographic characteristics, preoperative data, surgical procedures, postoperative adverse outcomes, and secondary surgery were recorded. Adverse outcomes were defined as new-onset VUR and BOO after surgery. The risks of adverse outcomes and secondary surgery were evaluated using multivariate binary logistic regression and expressed as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

      Results

      Adverse outcomes occurred in 25 (33.3%) patients, including 24 (32.0%) with new-onset vesicoureteral reflux and 1 (1.3%) with bladder outlet obstruction. Seven (9.3%) patients required secondary surgery. The independent risk factors for adverse outcomes were transurethral endoscopic incision and transurethral endoscopic puncture (transurethral endoscopic incision vs. upper pole partial nephrectomy: OR = 11.049, P = 0.004; transurethral endoscopic puncture vs. upper pole partial nephrectomy: OR = 33.222, P = 0.002).

      Discussion

      The definitive treatment for duplex system ureterocele remains controversial. We found that transurethral endoscopic incision or puncture was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. The main limitation of this study would be its retrospective nature and relatively short follow-up period. Furthermore, 30 children were younger than 5 years at last follow up, and thus, we could not efficiently evaluate their voiding function.

      Conclusions

      Summary TableMultivariate binary logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for adverse outcomes and secondary surgery.
      Variables Multivariate binary logistic regression of adverse outcomes Multivariate binary logistic regression of secondary surgery
      OR 95%CI P-value OR 95%CI P-value
      Age at operation (<6 months vs. ≥6 months) 0.720 0.144–3.606 0.689 4.646 0.537–40.165 0.163
      Preoperative SRF of upper moiety 0.969 0.889–1.057 0.483 1.013 0.899–1.142 0.832
      Maximum diameter of ureterocele 0.966 0.899–1.038 0.350 0.945 0.851–1.051 0.297
      Preoperative fUTI (yes vs. no) 0.545 0.151–1.964 0.353 0.953 0.137–6.606 0.961
      Time of diagnosis (antenatal vs. postnatal) 1.679 0.303–9.303 0.553 - - 0.998
      Procedures UPPN (Reference)
       TUI 11.049 2.148–56.822 0.004 2.087 0.158–27.554 0.576
       TUP 33.222 3.654–302.062 0.002 2.275 0.095–54.266 0.612
       CSR - - 0.999 - - 0.999
      OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SRF, split renal function; fUTI, febrile urinary tract infection; TUI, transurethral endoscopic incision; TUP, transurethral endoscopic puncture; CSR, common sheath reimplantation; UPPN, upper pole partial nephrectomy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Peters Craig A.
        • Mendelsohn Cathy
        Ectopic ureter, ureterocele, and ureteral anomalies.
        in: Wein A.J. Kavoussi L.R. Partin A.W. Peters C.A. Campbell-walsh Urology. 11th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia2016: 3075
        • Coplen D.E.
        • Duckett J.W.
        The modern approach to ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 1995; 153: 166-171https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199501000-00068
        • Han M.Y.
        • Gibbons M.D.
        • Belman A.B.
        • Pohl H.G.
        • Majd M.
        • Rushton H.G.
        Indications for nonoperative management of ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 2005; 174: 1652-1655https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000175943.95989.41
        • Jawdat J.
        • Rotem S.
        • Kocherov S.
        • Farkas A.
        • Chertin B.
        Does endoscopic puncture of ureterocele provide not only an initial solution but also a definitive treatment in all children? Over the 26 years of experience.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2018; 34: 561-565https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4258-9
        • Leclair M.D.
        • Vidal I.
        • Suply E.
        • Podevin G.
        • Héloury Y.
        Retroperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy in duplex kidney in infants and children: a 15-year experience.
        Eur Urol. 2009; 56: 385-389https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.015
        • Gran C.D.
        • Kropp B.P.
        • Cheng E.Y.
        • Kropp K.A.
        Primary lower urinary tract reconstruction for nonfunctioning renal moieties associated with obstructing ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 2005; 173: 198-201https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000148374.64478.b5
        • Le H.K.
        • Chiang G.
        Long-term management of ureterocele in duplex collecting systems: reconstruction implications.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19: 14https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0758-3
        • Hagg M.J.
        • Mourachov P.V.
        • Snyder H.M.
        • Canning D.A.
        • Kennedy W.A.
        • Zderic S.A.
        • et al.
        The modern endoscopic approach to ureterocele.
        J Urol. 2000; 163: 940-943
        • Sander J.C.
        • Bilgutay A.N.
        • Stanasel I.
        • Koh C.J.
        • Janzen N.
        • Gonzales E.T.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of endoscopic incision for the treatment of ureterocele in children at a single institution.
        J Urol. 2015; 193: 662-666https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.095
        • Adorisio O.
        • Elia A.
        • Landi L.
        • Taverna M.
        • Malvasio V.
        • Danti A.D.
        Effectiveness of primary endoscopic incision in treatment of ectopic ureterocele associated with duplex system.
        Urology. 2011 Jan; 77: 191-194https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.061
        • Haddad J.
        • Meenakshi-Sundaram B.
        • Rademaker N.
        • Greger H.
        • Aston C.
        • Palmer B.W.
        • et al.
        Watering can" ureterocele puncture technique leads to decreased rates of de novo vesicoureteral reflux and subsequent surgery with durable results.
        Urology. 2017; 108: 161-165https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.008
        • Glassberg K.I.
        • Braren V.
        • Duckett J.W.
        • Jacobs E.C.
        • King L.R.
        • Lebowitz R.L.
        • et al.
        Suggested terminology for duplex systems, ectopic ureters and ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 1984; 132: 1153https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50072-5
        • Castagnetti M.
        • El-Ghoneimi A.
        Management of duplex system ureteroceles in neonates and infants.
        Nat Rev Urol. 2009; 6: 307-315https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.82
        • Byun E.
        • Merguerian P.A.
        A meta-analysis of surgical practice patterns in the endoscopic management of ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 2006; 176: 1871-1877https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00601-X
        • Di Renzo D.
        • Ellsworth P.I.
        • Caldamone A.A.
        • Chiesa P.L.
        Transurethral puncture for ureterocele-which factors dictate outcomes?.
        J Urol. 2010; 184: 1620-1624https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.023
        • Husmann D.
        • Strand B.
        • Ewalt D.
        • Clement M.
        • Kramer S.
        • Allen T.
        Management of ectopic ureterocele associated with renal duplication: a comparison of partial nephrectomy and endoscopic decompression.
        J Urol. 1999; 162: 1406
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Im Y.J.
        • Shin S.H.
        • Bascuna Jr., R.T.
        • Ha J.Y.
        • Han S.W.
        Complications after common sheath reimplantation in pediatric patients with complicated duplex system.
        Urology. 2015; 85: 457-462https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.014
        • Husmann D.A.
        • Ewalt D.H.
        • Glenski W.J.
        • Bernier P.A.
        Ureterocele associated with ureteral duplication and a nonfunctioning upper pole segment: management by partial nephroureterectomy alone.
        J Urol. 1995; 154: 723-726https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199508000-00103
        • Ellerkamp V.
        • Szavay P.
        • Little T.
        • Schäfer J.F.
        • Amon O.
        • Fuchs J.
        Single-stage surgical approach in complicated pediatric ureteral duplication: surgical and functional outcome.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2014; 30: 99-105https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3411-8