Advertisement

An alternative lower tract approach to ectopic duplex system ureteroceles feasible in young children

  • Cynthia Sze-Ya Ting
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Surgery, Chang Gung Children's Hospital, Chang Gung University, School of Medicine, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Pei-Yeh Chang
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: Pei-Yeh Chang, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Chang Gung General Hospital, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan No.5, Fusing St., Gueishan Township, Taoyuan County 333, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 3 3281200x8227; fax: +886 3 3285056
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatric Surgery, Chang Gung Children's Hospital, Chang Gung University, School of Medicine, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 11, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.10.010

      Summary

      Introduction

      The best surgical approach to ectopic ureters and ureteroceles is yet to be determined. The objective of this study is to provide an alternative lower tract surgical approach to ectopic ureters and duplex system ureteroceles that can be safely performed in young children.

      Methods

      The “in-and-out” bladder approach was performed via an open intravesical incision. The upper and lower pole ureters were mobilized and brought into the bladder. The dilated ureter/ureterocele was cut open, and the distal part was deuroepithelialized. Subsequently, common sheath reimplantation was performed. The ureterocele wall was not involved during the whole procedure. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgery for ureteroceles and ectopic ureters between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019. Patients with intravesical ureteroceles were excluded. Outcome parameters included the presence of hydronephrosis or reflux, split renal function on DMSA scan, incidence of urinary tract infection, and urinary incontinence.

      Results

      A total of 32 patients with ectopic duplex system ureterocele who underwent the “in-and-out” bladder approach between 2004 and 2019 were included in the retrospective study. The median age at operation was 7.8 months (range: 1.5 months–3.0 years). The median length of follow-up was 6.1 years (range: 1.0 years–14.3 years). Sixteen patients (55%) had ipsilateral vesicoureteral reflux. Five patients postoperatively developed a urinary tract infection within 1–3 years. No patients required further endoscopic treatment or surgeries. During long-term follow-up, two patients (6.3%) had intermittent day wetting at the ages of 4 and 5 years and were managed conservatively. The symptoms of intermittent day wetting subsided during follow-up.

      Conclusions

      Summary Figure
      Graphical AbstractProcedure of the “in-and-out bladder” approach to surgically treating ectopic ureterocele. (a) A mucosal incision was made along the lower edge of the orifice of the lower pole ureter. (b) A 7-0 polydioxanone stay suture was performed on the orifice of the ipsilateral lower pole ureter to facilitate the dissection. The lower pole ureter was then dissected out and cut open. (c) The mucosal layer of the distal stump/ureterocele was detached as distally as possible and ligated intramurally. (d) Common sheath reimplantation was performed through a submucosal tunnel.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sander J.C.
        • Bilgutay A.N.
        • Stanasel I.
        • Koh C.J.
        • Janzen N.
        • Gonzales E.T.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of endoscopic incision for the treatment of ureterocele in children at a single institution.
        J Urol. 2015; 193: 662-666https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.095
        • Jawdat J.
        • Rotem S.
        • Kocherov S.
        • Farkas A.
        • Chertin B.
        Does endoscopic puncture of ureterocele provide not only an initial solution, but also a definitive treatment in all children? Over the 26 years of experience.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2018; 34: 561-565https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4258-9
        • Park J.S.
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Lee C.N.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Kim S.W.
        • Lee H.
        • et al.
        Transurethral incision as initial option in treatment guidelines for ectopic ureteroceles associated with duplex systems.
        World J Urol. 2019; 37: 2237-2244https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2607-x
        • Pani E.
        • Negri E.
        • Cini C.
        • Landi L.
        • Mantovani A.
        • Bortot G.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic treatment of ureterocele in children: results of a single referral tertiary center over a 10 year-period.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2022; 18: e1-e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.12.008
        • Pearce R.
        • Subramaniam R.
        Partial nephroureterectomy in a duplex system in children: the need for additional bladder procedures.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2011; 27: 1323-1326https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2968-3
        • McLeod D.J.
        • Alpert S.A.
        • Ural Z.
        • Jayanthi V.R.
        Ureteroureterostomy irrespective of ureteral size or upper pole function: a single center experience.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2014; 10: 616-619https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4258-910.1016/j.jpurol.2014.05.003
        • Michaud J.E.
        • Akhavan A.
        Upper Pole heminephrectomy versus lower Pole ureteroureterostomy for ectopic upper Pole ureters.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2017; 18: 21https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0664-0
        • Sheth K.R.
        • White J.T.
        • Janzen N.
        • Koh C.J.
        • Austin P.F.
        • Roth D.R.
        • et al.
        Evaluating outcomes of differential surgical management of nonfunctioning upper Pole renal moieties in duplex collecting systems.
        Urology. 2019; 123: 198-203https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.028
        • Husmann D.A.
        • Ewalt D.H.
        • Glenski W.J.
        • Bernier P.A.
        Ureterocele associated with ureteral duplication and a nonfunctioning upper pole segment: management by partial nephroureterectomy alone.
        J Urol. 1995; 154: 723-726https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199508000-00103
        • Castagnetti M.
        • El-Ghoneimi A.
        Management of duplex system ureteroceles in neonates and infants.
        Nat Rev Urol. 2009; 6: 307-315https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.82
        • Le H.K.
        • Chiang G.
        Long-term management of ureterocele in duplex collecting systems: reconstruction implications.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19: 14https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0758-3
        • Coplen D.E.
        • Barthold J.S.
        Controversies in the management of ectopic ureteroceles.
        Urology. 2000; 56: 665-668https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00721-4
        • Beganović A.
        • Klijn A.J.
        • Dik P.
        • De Jong T.P.
        Ectopic ureterocele: long-term results of open surgical therapy in 54 patients.
        J Urol. 2007; 178: 251-254https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.063
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Im Y.J.
        • Shin S.H.
        • Bascuna Jr., R.T.
        • Ha J.Y.
        • Han S.W.
        Complications after common sheath reimplantation in pediatric patients with complicated duplex system.
        Urology. 2015; 85: 457-462https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.014
        • Keene D.J.B.
        • Subramaniam R.
        Duplex systems: top-down or bottom-up approach?.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16: e1-e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.005
        • Mor Y.
        • Ramon J.
        • Raviv G.
        • Jonas P.
        • Goldwasser B.
        A 20-year experience with treatment of ectopic ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 1992; 147: 1592-1594https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37637-1
        • Coplen D.E.
        • Duckett J.W.
        The modern approach to ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 1995; 153: 166-171https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199501000-00068
        • Holmes N.M.
        • Coplen D.E.
        • Strand W.
        • Husmann D.
        • Baskin L.S.
        Is bladder dysfunction and incontinence associated with ureteroceles congenital or acquired?.
        J Urol. 2002; 168: 718-719
        • Abrahamsson K.
        • Hansson E.
        • Sillén U.
        • Hermansson G.
        • Hjälmås K.
        Bladder dysfunction: an integral part of the ectopic ureterocele complex.
        J Urol. 1998; 160: 1468-1470https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62593-x
        • Vereecken R.L.
        • Proesmans W.
        Extensive surgery on the trigone for complete ureteral duplication does not cause incontinence or voiding problems.
        Urology. 2000; 55 (discussion 70-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00429-x): 267-270