Advertisement

Does pre-fellowship experience alter success rates of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux during pediatric urology fellowship?

      Summary

      Introduction

      Learning curve is a well-known factor that affects the success rate of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

      Objective

      To our knowledge, the significance of pre-fellowship training has not been studied. In the present study, our aim was to investigate the effect of pre-fellowship training on the endoscopic treatment success rates of pediatric urology fellows.

      Design

      A total of 78 patients aged 2–16 years (132 renal units) who underwent subureteric injection for the treatment of primary VUR by four pediatric urology fellows between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Fellows were grouped into two as experienced and non-experienced according to the presence of pre-fellowship experience (defined as a minimum of 20 procedures). Patients in both groups were divided into two subgroups as non-dilating (grade I-II) and dilating VUR (grade III-V). Also, the change in success rate throughout the fellowship was analyzed. HIT or Double HIT method was used in all interventions.

      Results

      Experienced fellows carried out subureteric injection in 54 (40.9%) renal units while non-experienced fellows performed in 78 (59.1%). There was no success rate difference between experienced and non-experienced fellow groups in non-dilating VUR (100% vs. 88%, respectively p = 0.268), whereas the success rate of the experienced group was significantly higher in dilated VUR (78.9% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.006). Moreover, the amount of material used in the treatment of non-dilating VUR were similar between two fellow groups (0.6 ml vs. 0.6 ml, p = 0.500), while experienced group achieved higher success rates in dilating VUR by statistically significant less amount of injected volume (0.7 ml vs. 0.9 ml, p = 0.026).Overall complete VUR resolution rates were similar throughout the fellowship period in the experienced fellows (81.5% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.444), while it significantly increased in the non-experienced group implicating the completion of the learning curve (51.3% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.035).

      Discussion

      There has been no published reports on the effect of pre-fellowship experience on subureteric injection success. While many researchers reported on the importance of learning curve, various studies assessed the effect of injected volume on success rate implicating contradictory results. Furthermore, others indicated that the ideal technique providing accurate needle placement and obtaining proper depth during injection which is associated with surgical experience is more important than the injected volume in achieving success.

      Conclusion

      Summary figure
      Graphical AbstractThe graph shows the change of overall complete VUR resolution rates in four fellows, individually, by case number.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      Dx/HA (Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer), EAU/ESPU (European Association of Urology/European Society for Paediatric Urology), HIT (hydrodistention implantation technique), IQR (Interquartile range), STING (Subureteral transurethral injection), VCUG (Voiding cystourethrogram), VUR (Vesicoureteral reflux)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Holmdahl G.
        • Brandström P.
        • Läckgren G.
        • Sillén U.
        • Stokland E.
        • Jodal U.
        • et al.
        The Swedish reflux trial in children: II. Vesicoureteral reflux outcome.
        J Urol. 2010; 184: 280-285https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.059
        • Läckgren G.
        • Cooper C.S.
        • Neveus T.
        • Kirsch A.J.
        Management of vesicoureteral reflux: what have we learned over the last 20 Years?.
        Front. Pediatr. 2021; 9650326https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.650326
        • Elder J.S.
        • Diaz M.
        • Caldamone A.A.
        • Cendron M.
        • Greenfield S.
        • Hurwitz R.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic therapy for vesicoureteral reflux: a meta-analysis. I. Reflux resolution and urinary tract infection.
        J Urol. 2006; 175: 716-722https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00210-7
        • Radmayr C.
        • Bogaert G.
        • Dogan H.S.
        • Nijman J.M.
        • Rawashdeh Y.F.H.
        • Silay M.S.
        • et al.
        European association of urology guidelines on paediatric urology: the 2021 update.
        EAU Guidelines Office, 2021 (Arnhem, The Netherlands. Available from:)
        • Chandrasekharam V.V.S.
        Do volume of injection and learning curve influence the results of endoscopic correction of vesicoureteric reflux using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid? A single surgeon experience.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2021; 31: 220-224
        • Dave S.
        • Lorenzo A.J.
        • Khoury A.E.
        • Braga L.H.
        • Skeldon S.J.
        • Suoub M.
        • et al.
        Learning from the learning curve: factors associated with successful endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer.
        J Urol. 2008; 180 (; discussion 1599-600): 1594-1599https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.084
        • Dalkiliç A.
        • Bayar G.
        • Demirkan H.
        • Horasanli K.
        The learning curve of sting method for endoscopic injection treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.
        Int Braz J Urol. 2018; 44: 1200-1206
        • Lorenzo A.J.
        • Pippi Salle J.L.
        • Barroso U.
        • Cook A.
        • Grober E.
        • Wallis M.C.
        • et al.
        What are the most powerful determinants of endoscopic vesicoureteral reflux correction? Multivariate analysis of a single institution experience during 6 years.
        J Urol. 2006; 176: 1851-1855https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00599-4
        • Kirsch A.J.
        • Perez-Brayfield M.R.
        • Scherz H.C.
        Minimally invasive treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: atlanta Children's Hospitals experience.
        J Urol. 2003; 170: 211-215
        • Nelson C.P.
        • Copp H.L.
        • Lai J.
        • Saigal C.S.
        Urologic Diseases in America Project. Is availability of endoscopy changing initial management of vesicoureteral reflux?.
        J Urol. 2009; 182: 1152-1157
        • Pogorelić Z.
        • Gudelj K.
        • Budimir D.
        • Todorić J.
        • Jukić M.
        • Furlan D.
        • et al.
        Comparison of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid based bulking agents in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: deflux versus Vurdex.
        Can J Urol. 2016; 23: 8312-8317
        • Routh J.C.
        • Inman B.A.
        • Reinberg Y.
        Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: systematic review.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 1010-1019
        • Lavelle M.T.
        • Conlin M.J.
        • Skoog S.J.
        Subureteral injection of Deflux for correction of reflux: analysis of factors predicting success.
        Urology. 2005; 65: 564-567
        • Routh J.C.
        • Vandersteen D.R.
        • Pfefferle H.
        • Wolpert J.J.
        • Reinberg Y.
        Single center experience with endoscopic management of vesicoureteral reflux in children.
        J Urol. 2006; 175: 1889-1892
        • Watters S.T.
        • Sung J.
        • Skoog S.J.
        Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux: how important is the technique?.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9: 1192-1197
        • Yucel S.
        • Gupta A.
        • Snodgrass W.
        Multivariate analysis of factors predicting success with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection for vesicoureteral reflux.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 1505-1509
        • Higham-Kessler J.
        • Reinert S.E.
        • Snodgrass W.T.
        • Hensle T.W.
        • Koyle M.A.
        • Hurwitz R.S.
        • et al.
        A review of failures of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer microspheres.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 710-714https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.082
        • Hidas G.
        • Soltani T.
        • Watts B.
        • Pribish M.
        • Khoury A.E.
        Is the appearance of the dextranomer/hyaluronic acid mound predictive of reflux resolution?.
        J Urol. 2013; 189 (–5): 1882https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.110