Advertisement

Sexual health outcomes after penile reconstruction in the exstrophy–epispadias complex

Published:February 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.02.016

      Summary

      Introduction

      The penis in exstrophy–epispadias complex (EEC) males is diminutive and patients are often dissatisfied with appearance and length. Due to an increased risk of psychosexual dysfunction, patients desire penile reconstruction. Surgical options include penile lengthening with a full thickness skin graft (SG) or tissue expansion (TE) used for cutaneous coverage or neophalloplasty using a radial forearm free flap or pedicled antero-lateral thigh flap.

      Objective

      The aim of this study was to assess sexual health outcomes before and after SG or TE assisted lengthening and neophalloplasty.

      Study design

      Patients aged 18 years or older, who underwent penile reconstruction were identified using an institutionally approved database of EEC patients. Patient perception of penile appearance, sexual function, their frequency of sexual intercourse and overall satisfaction with reconstruction were assessed using a survey consisting of validated and non-validated questions.

      Results

      Eighty-three patients underwent penile reconstruction, 57 met the inclusion criteria and 28 responded to the survey (49.1%). Fourteen were reconstructed using a SG, 6 with TE and 8 underwent neophalloplasty. Median time from reconstruction to survey completion was 4.4 years (range 1.2–13.2) Four patients had a diagnosis of epispadias, 1 cloacal exstrophy, 23 classic bladder exstrophy (CBE). Before reconstruction patients were dissatisfied with their penile appearance with a median penile perception score of 4.5 compared to 7.5 after surgery (p = 0.0034, Fig. 1). Twenty-three patients were dissatisfied with penile length, with 18 reporting an improvement following reconstruction (p = 0.0002). There was no correlation in time after reconstruction with PPS or satisfaction with penile length (p = 0.86 and p = 0.55, respectively). Overall, the median Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score was 19, with no difference between the surgical groups (p = 0.33). Nine patients engaged in sexual intercourse before reconstruction which increased to 17 afterwards.

      Conclusion

      All three surgical methods improved patient perception of penile appearance and length. Patients who previously never engaged in intercourse were able to and those who had were doing so more frequently, of which a greater proportion were in a relationship. The results are encouraging though must be interpreted with caution due to the small number of responders and possible risk of bias. These findings provide vital information for future patients and routine psychological assessment will help manage patient expectations to improve satisfaction.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      EEC (exstrophy–epispadias complex), TE (tissue expansion), SG (skin graft), RFFF (radial forearm free flap), PALTF (pedicled antero-lateral thigh flap), IPP (inflatable penile prosthesis), PPS (Penile Perception Score), SHIM (Sexual Health Inventory for Men), MSHQ-EjD-SF (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire short form for assessing ejaculatory dysfunction), CBE (classic bladder exstrophy), CE (cloacal exstrophy), MSRE (modern staged repair of bladder exstrophy), CPRE (complete primary repair of exstrophy), IQR (interquartile range), ED (erectile dysfunction)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wood H.M.
        • Trock B.J.
        • Gearhart J.P.
        In vitro fertilization and the cloacal-bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex: is there an association?.
        J Urol. 2003; 169: 1512-1515
        • Silver R.I.
        • Yang A.
        • Ben-Chaim J.
        • Gearhart J.P.
        Penile length in adulthood after exstrophy reconstruction.
        J Urol. 1997; 157: 999-1003
        • Rowe C.K.
        • Shnorhavorian M.
        • Block P.
        • Ahn J.
        • Merguerian P.A.
        Using social media for patient-reported outcomes: a study of genital appearance and sexual function in adult bladder exstrophy patients.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2018; 14: 322.e1-322.e6
        • Baumgartner T.S.
        • Lue K.M.
        • Sirisreetreerux P.
        • Metzger S.
        • Everett R.G.
        • Reddy S.S.
        • et al.
        Long-term sexual health outcomes in men with classic bladder exstrophy.
        BJU Int. 2017; 120: 422-427
        • Suominen J.S.
        • Santtila P.
        • Taskinen S.
        Sexual function in patients operated on for bladder exstrophy and epispadias.
        J Urol. 2015; 194: 195-199
        • Harris T.G.W.
        • Maruf M.
        • Leto Barone A.A.
        • Redett III, R.J.
        • Gearhart J.P.
        Utility of tissue expansion in penile reconstruction for the exstrophy epispadias complex.
        Urology. 2020; 136: 231-237
        • Massanyi E.Z.
        • Gupta A.
        • Goel S.
        • Gearhart J.P.
        • Burnett A.L.
        • Bivalacqua T.J.
        • et al.
        Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty for penile inadequacy in patients with exstrophy.
        J Urol. 2013; 190: 1577-1582
        • Harris T.G.W.
        • Manyevitch R.
        • Wu W.J.
        • Leto Barone A.A.
        • Bivalacqua T.J.
        • Burnett A.L.
        • et al.
        Pedicled anterolateral thigh and radial forearm free flap phalloplasty for penile reconstruction in patents with bladder exstrophy.
        J Urol. 2021; 205: 880-887
        • Garaffa G.
        • Spilotros M.
        • Christopher N.A.
        • Ralph D.J.
        Total phallic reconstruction using radial artery based forearm free flap phalloplasty in patients with epispadias-exstrophy complex.
        J Urol. 2014; 192: 814-820
        • Young E.E.
        • Friedlander D.
        • Lue K.
        • Anele U.A.
        • Khurgin J.L.
        • Bivalacqua T.J.
        • et al.
        Sexual function and quality of life before and after penile prosthesis implantation following radial forearm phalloplasty.
        Urology. 2017; 104: 204-208
        • Weber D.M.
        • Landolt M.A.
        • Gobet R.
        • Kalisch M.
        • Greeff N.K.
        The Penile Perception Score: an instrument enabling evaluation by surgeons and patients self-assessment after hypospadias repair.
        J Urol. 2013; 189: 189-193
        • Rosen R.C.
        • Cappelleri J.C.
        • Smith M.D.
        • Lipsky J.
        • Peña B.M.
        Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction.
        Int J Impot Res. 1999; 11: 319-326
        • Rosen R.C.
        • Catania J.A.
        • Althof S.E.
        • Pollack L.M.
        • O'Leary M.
        • Seftel A.D.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of four-item version of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire to assess ejaculatory dysfunction.
        Urology. 2007; 69: 805-809
        • Herbenick D.
        • Schick V.
        • Reece M.
        • Sanders S.A.
        • Fortenberry J.D.
        The development and validation of the Male Genital Self-Image Scale: results from a nationally representative probability samples of men in the United States.
        J Sex Med. 2013; 10: 1516-1525
        • Althof S.E.
        • Cappelleri J.C.
        • Shpilsky A.
        • Stecher V.
        • Diuguid C.
        • Sweeney M.
        • et al.
        Treatment responsiveness of the Self-Esteem and Relationship questionnaire in erectile dysfunction.
        Urology. 2003; 61: 888-892
        • Pennison M.C.
        • Mednick L.
        • Grant R.
        • Price D.
        • Rosoklija I.
        • Huang L.
        • et al.
        A survey to assess body and self-image in individuals with bladder exstrophy: a call for psychosocial support.
        J Urol. 2013; 190: 1572-1576
        • Pennison M.C.
        • Mednick L.
        • Rosoklija I.
        • Grant R.
        • Price D.
        • Huang L.
        • et al.
        Health related quality of life in patients with bladder exstrophy: a call for targeted interventions.
        J Urol. 2014; 191: 1553-1557
        • Kasprenski M.
        • Maruf M.
        • Davis R.
        • Jayman J.
        • Benz K.
        • Michaud J.
        • et al.
        Penile disassembly in complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy: time for Re-evaluation?.
        Urology. 2020; 137: 146-151
        • Hussmann D.A.
        • Gearhart J.P.
        Loss of the penile glans and/or corpora following primary repair of bladder exstrophy using the complete penile disassembly technique.
        J Urol. 2004; 172 (discussion 1700-1): 1696-1800
        • Saad K.
        • Jayanthi R.
        • Gorgollo P.
        • Whittam B.
        • Rink R.
        • Fuchs M.
        • et al.
        v09-05 Assessment of tissue perfusion using intraoperative laser angiography in bladder exstrophy closure.
        J Urol. 2020; 203 (e834): e834
        • Castagnetti M.
        • Tocco A.
        • Capizzi A.
        • Rigamonti W.
        • Artibani W.
        Sexual function in men born with classic bladder exstrophy: a norm related study.
        J Urol. 2010; 183: 1118-1122
        • Rubenwolf P.
        • Thomas C.
        • Thüroff J.W.
        • Stein R.
        Sexual function, social integration and paternity of males with classic bladder exstrophy following urinary diversion.
        J Urol. 2016; 195: 465-470
        • Park W.
        • Zwink N.
        • Rösch W.H.
        • Schmiedeke E.
        • Stein R.
        • Schmidt D.
        • et al.
        Sexual function in adult patients with classic bladder exstrophy: a multicenter study.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11: 125.e1-125.e6
        • Lee C.
        • Reutter H.M.
        • Grässer M.F.
        • Fisch M.
        • Noeker M.
        Gender-associated differences in the psychosocial and developmental outcome in patients affected with the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex.
        BJU Int. 2006; 97: 349-353
        • Garcia M.M.
        • Christopher N.A.
        • De Luca F.
        • Spilotros M.
        • Ralph D.J.
        Overall satisfaction, sexual function, and the durability of neophallus dimensions following staged female to male genital gender confirming surgery: the Institute of Urology, London U.K. experience.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2014; 3: 156-162
        • Sharp G.
        • Oates J.
        Sociocultural influences on men's penis size perception and decisions to undergo penile augmentation: a qualitative study.
        Aesthetic Surg J. 2019; 39: 1253-1259
        • Hankinson J.C.
        • Eldridge M.A.
        • Ostrander R.
        • Shah B.
        • Reynolds E.K.
        • Perry-Parrish C.
        • et al.
        Emotional and behavioral functioning in children with bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex: a developmental perspective.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 136-141
        • King B.M.
        Average-size erect penis: fiction, fact and the need for counseling.
        J Sex Marital Ther. 2021; 47: 80-89
        • Sinatti C.
        • Wolff D.
        • Buncamper M.
        • Verla W.
        • Claes K.
        • Lumen N.
        • et al.
        Phalloplasty in cis-men with penile insufficiency: evaluation of outcomes and surgical complications: good ability to achieve orgasm, high urinary complication rate.
        Int J Impot Res. 2021; 22: 178-183
        • Sinatti C.
        • Wolff D.
        • Buncamper M.
        • Verla W.
        • Claes K.
        • Lumen N.
        • et al.
        Phalloplasty in biological men with penile insufficiency.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16: 404-405

      Linked Article