Summary
Introduction/Background
Reconstructive and ablative urologic techniques require special technical mastery,
especially the intracorporeal suturing.
Objective
To report the subjective evaluation of a versatile ex-vivo model aimed to practice laparoscopic ureteric reconstructive techniques (LURT) on
box-trainer.
Study design
The model is a continuous portion of porcine urinary bladder (“dilated pelvis”), the
vesico-ureteral joint (“stenosis”) and healthy ureter. All 127 participants (n = 119
urologists and n = 8 paediatric surgeons) performed on the model laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes
dismembered pyeloplasty, and then, in the animal model, different LURT procedures
(ureteroneocystostomy, ureteric reimplantation and/or dismembered pyeloplasty). The
model was subjectively evaluated (face and content validity), through a 12 items questionnaire,
based on a Likert scale (1–5 points) and a global question (1–10 points).
Results
The total mean rating for 11/12 items was very high (>4points). Only one was rated
under 3 points. The overall total mean rating from 1 to 10 points was very high (9.19 ± 0.82
points). In 10/12 items, expert's feedback (content validity) prevailed over non-experts
(face validity).
Discussion/conclusion
Graphical AbstractA) LURT organic model arranged on an angled platform (±45°) for the practice of dismembered
pyeloplasty. Note the simple assembly of the model inside the physical simulator is
shown. B) Suture line correctly performed by an expert. C) An incorrect apposition
of the edges can be seen. Besides, some fatty tissue is incorrectly included in the
suture line.
Keywords
Abbreviations:
LURT (laparoscopic ureteric reconstructive techniques)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric UrologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Operative atlas of laparoscopic reconstructive urology.Springer London, London2009https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-151-0
- Chicken and porcine models for training in laparoscopy and robotics.Curr Opin Urol. 2015; 25: 158-162https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000139
- Current status of simulation and training models in urological surgery: a systematic review.J Urol. 2016; 196: 312-320https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.131
- Design and validation of a low-cost, high-fidelity model for robotic pyeloplasty simulation training.J Pediatr Urol. 2020; S1477–5131: 30024-30033https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.02.003
- LAParoscopic simulator for pediatric ureteral reimplantation (LAP-SPUR) following the Lich-Gregoir technique.J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Apr; 14: 137-143https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.11.020
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 02, 2021
Accepted:
February 24,
2021
Received:
November 25,
2020
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Journal of Pediatric Urology Company.
