Advertisement

Semi-closed-circuit vacuum-assisted MiniPCNL system in pediatric patients

Published:February 10, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.02.003

      Summary

      Surgical treatment of kidney stones has changed over the years. The use of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MiniPCNL) instrumentation is associated with a reduction of major complications but it lengthens the operative time (OT). This limit may be overcome by a semi-closed-circuit vacuum-assisted MiniPCNL system, characterized by a continuous inflow and a suction-controlled outflow. We present our initial experience in pediatric patients who underwent PCNL using a 12 Fr nephroscope and a 16-Fr-large nephrostomy sheath, equipped with a lateral arm connected to suction. We used Holmium laser lithotripsy and performed lapaxy by drawing back slowly the nephroscope inside the sheath until the opening of the lateral aspiration arm, without using other devices. The stone-free rate (SFR) was assessed at 4 weeks. We included 12 procedures in 8 patients with a median age of 119 months and a median weight of 27 Kg. The median OT was 108 min and the SFR was 80%. No intra-operative complications occurred, while minor post-operative complications occurred after 4/12 procedures. These preliminary data in pediatric population showed the employed system is a safe and effective approach to treat complex kidney stones with a satisfactory SFR and a low OT.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rassweiler J.
        • Rassweiler M.C.
        • Klein J.
        New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Jan; 26 (PMID: 26626887): 95-106https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000240
        • De S.
        • Autorino R.
        • Kim F.J.
        • Zargar H.
        • Laydner H.
        • Balsamo R.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2015 Jan; 67 (Epub 2014 Jul 23. Erratum in: Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):e85. PMID: 25064687): 125-137https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003
        • Li L.Y.
        • Gao X.
        • Yang M.
        • Li J.F.
        • Zhang H.B.
        • Xu W.F.
        • et al.
        Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to less invasiveness? A prospective comparative study.
        Urology. 2010 Jan; 75 (Epub 2009 Oct 2. PMID: 19800671): 56-61https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.006
        • Zeng G.
        • Wan S.
        • Zhao Z.
        • Zhu J.
        • Tuerxun A.
        • Song C.
        • et al.
        Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation.
        BJU Int. 2016 Apr; 117 (Epub 2015 Aug 22. PMID: 26220396): 655-661https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13242
        • Gallioli A.
        • Berrettini A.
        • Sampogna G.
        • Llorens E.
        • Quiróz Y.
        • Gnech M.
        • et al.
        Semi-closed-circuit vacuum-assisted mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric population: the initial experience of two tertiary referral centers.
        Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct 5; https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03951-X