Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 15, ISSUE 5, P526.e1-526.e6, October 2019

Fate of the micropenis and constitutional small penis: do they grow to normalcy in puberty?

  • J.H. Han
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul 50555, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • J.P. Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul 50555, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • J.S. Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul 50555, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • S.H. Song
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul 50555, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • K.S. Kim
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 50555, South Korea. Tel.: +82 2 3010 3736; fax: +82 2 477 8928.
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul 50555, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      Introduction

      Penile length is an important indicator of male sexual development. Scarce data were reported on penile length measurements in children comparing changes between prepuberty and puberty for the small penile issue with long-term follow-up.

      Objective

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of catch-up growth of the penile length of boys with a small penis in the long-term follow-up.

      Study design

      From April 2001 to December 2016, 27 boys who visited the outpatient clinic owing to a small penis, without any chromosomal anomalies and other genital disorder, were investigated retrospectively. Micropenis is defined as 2.5 standard deviations less than the mean stretched penile length (SPL) of age. Periodic penile length, testicular volume, hormonal levels (serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)), and bone age were measured. Pubertal development was recorded by using the Tanner scale. The effect of hormonal therapy and the factors attributable to the increment of the penile length were evaluated.

      Results

      The mean age at the first visit was 9.8 years (5–12 years) and that at puberty was 12.6 years (10–16 years). The length of the penis at the initial visit was 4.0 ± 0.8 cm (2.5–6.0) and at puberty, 7.3 ± 1.8 cm (4.0–12.0). Nine patients diagnosed with micropenis no longer had a micropenis in puberty. The less the age-matched SPL, the more the increment of SPL that was observed (rho = - 0.548, P = 0.003). The mean increment of SPL in the hormonal therapy group (11 boys) and the non-hormonal therapy group (16 boys) was not statistically different (43.5 ± 22. 9% vs 41.5 ± 21.6%, respectively, P = 0.497).

      Discussion

      This study explains how much the growth of a small penis catches up in puberty. From the point of view of the increment of SPL, the increment was higher in boys who belonged to the smaller penis group. Hormonal therapy does not attribute to an increase in the length after long-term follow-up. Limitations of this study were its retrospective origin with a small number of patients in a single center.

      Conclusion

      Catch-up growth of the small penis at puberty was accomplished in most children with a small penis before puberty. Hormonal treatment was not significantly correlated with the penile length increment in the long-term follow-up.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lee P.A.
        • Mazur T.
        • Danish R.
        • Amrhein J.
        • Blizzard R.M.
        • Money J.
        • et al.
        Micropenis. I. Criteria, etiologies and classification.
        Johns Hopkins Med J. 1980; 146: 156-163
        • Hatipoglu N.
        • Kurtoglu S.
        Micropenis: etiology, diagnosis and treatment approaches.
        J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013; 5: 217-223
        • Nelson C.P.
        • Park J.M.
        • Wan J.
        • Bloom D.A.
        • Dunn R.L.
        • Wei J.T.
        The increasing incidence of congenital penile anomalies in the United States.
        J Urol. 2005; 174: 1573-1576
        • Paris F.
        • De Ferran K.
        • Bhangoo A.
        • Ten S.
        • Lahlou N.
        • Audran F.
        • et al.
        Isolated ′idiopathic′ micropenis: hidden genetic defects?.
        Int J Androl. 2011; 34: e518-e525
        • Gabrich P.N.
        • Vasconcelos J.S.
        • Damiao R.
        • Silva E.A.
        Penile anthropometry in Brazilian children and adolescents.
        J Pediatr. 2007; 83: 441-446
        • Soydan H.
        • Akyol I.
        • Ates F.
        • Yilmaz O.
        • Dursun F.
        • Baykal K.
        Cross-sectional analysis of penile length in males 13 to 15 years old according to pubertal development stages.
        J Urol. 2012; 188: 1319-1323
        • El-Ammawi T.S.
        • Abdel-Aziz R.T.
        • Medhat W.
        • Nasif G.A.
        • Abdel-Rahman S.G.
        Measurement of stretched penile length in prepubertal boys in Egypt.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2018; 14: 553 e1-e5
        • Kutlu A.O.
        Normative data for penile length in Turkish newborns.
        J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2010; 2: 107-110
        • Camurdan A.D.
        • Oz M.O.
        • Ilhan M.N.
        • Camurdan O.M.
        • Sahin F.
        • Beyazova U.
        Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years.
        Urology. 2007; 70: 572-575
        • Teckchandani N.
        • Bajpai M.
        Penile length nomogram for Asian Indian prepubertal boys.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 352-354
        • Ishii T.
        • Matsuo N.
        • Inokuchi M.
        • Hasegawa T.
        A cross-sectional growth reference and chart of stretched penile length for Japanese boys aged 0-7 years.
        Horm Res Paediatr. 2014; 82: 388-393
        • Park S.
        • Chung J.M.
        • Kang D.I.
        • Ryu D.S.
        • Cho W.Y.
        • Lee S.D.
        The change of stretched penile length and anthropometric data in Korean children aged 0-14 Years: comparative study of last 25 years.
        J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31: 1631-1634
        • Tomova A.
        • Deepinder F.
        • Robeva R.
        • Lalabonova H.
        • Kumanov P.
        • Agarwal A.
        Growth and development of male external genitalia: a cross-sectional study of 6200 males aged 0 to 19 years.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164: 1152-1157
        • Wang Y.N.
        • Zeng Q.
        • Xiong F.
        • Zeng Y.
        Male external genitalia growth curves and charts for children and adolescents aged 0 to 17 years in Chongqing, China.
        Asian J Androl. 2018; 20: 567-571
        • Sutherland R.S.
        • Kogan B.A.
        • Baskin L.S.
        • Mevorach R.A.
        • Conte F.
        • Kaplan S.L.
        • et al.
        The effect of prepubertal androgen exposure on adult penile length.
        J Urol. 1996; 156 (discussion 7): 783-787
        • Chung K.H.
        • Choi H.
        • Kim S.W.
        Penile and testicular sizes of Korean children.
        Korean J Urol. 1987; 28: 255-258
        • Nerli R.B.
        • Guntaka A.K.
        • Patne P.B.
        • Hiremath M.B.
        Penile growth in response to hormone treatment in children with micropenis.
        Indian J Urol. 2013; 29: 288-291
        • Massa G.G.
        • Langenhorst V.
        • Oostdijk W.
        • Wit J.M.
        [Micropenis in children: etiology, diagnosis and therapy].
        Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997; 141: 511-515
        • Tsang S.
        When size matters: a clinical review of pathological micropenis.
        J Pediatr Health Care. 2010; 24: 231-240
        • Wylie K.R.
        • Eardley I.
        Penile size and the ′small penis syndrome′.
        BJU Int. 2007; 99: 1449-1455
        • Damon V.
        • Berlier P.
        • Durozier B.
        • Francois R.
        [Study of the dimensions of the penis from birth to adult age and as a function of testicular volume].
        Pediatrie. 1990; 45: 519-522
        • Emmanuel M.
        • Bokor B.R.
        Tanner stages. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL).
        StatPearls Publishing StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2018
        • Koskenniemi J.J.
        • Virtanen H.E.
        • Toppari J.
        Testicular growth and development in puberty.
        Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017; 24: 215-224
        • Bin-Abbas B.
        • Conte F.A.
        • Grumbach M.M.
        • Kaplan S.L.
        Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and micropenis: effect of testosterone treatment on adult penile size why sex reversal is not indicated.
        J Pediatr. 1999; 134: 579-583
        • Burstein S.
        • Grumbach M.M.
        • Kaplan S.L.
        Early determination of androgen-responsiveness is important in the management of microphallus.
        Lancet (London, England). 1979; 2: 983-986
        • Sun M.
        • Choueiri T.K.
        • Hamnvik O.P.
        • Preston M.A.
        • De Velasco G.
        • Jiang W.
        • et al.
        Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and orchiectomy: effects of androgen-deprivation therapy.
        JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2: 500-507
        • Sato N.
        • Hasegawa T.
        • Hasegawa Y.
        • Arisaka O.
        • Ozono K.
        • Amemiya S.
        • et al.
        Treatment situation of male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in pediatrics and proposal of testosterone and gonadotropins replacement therapy protocols.
        Clin Pediatr Endocrinol : Case Rep Clin Invest Off J Japanese Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 2015; 24: 37-49
        • Kim S.O.
        • Ryu K.H.
        • Hwang I.S.
        • Jung S.I.
        • Oh K.J.
        • Park K.
        Penile growth in response to human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) treatment in patients with idiopathic hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism.
        Chonnam Med J. 2011; 47: 39-42
        • Main K.M.
        • Schmidt I.M.
        • Skakkebaek N.E.
        A possible role for reproductive hormones in newborn boys: progressive hypogonadism without the postnatal testosterone peak.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85: 4905-4907
        • Baskin L.S.
        • Sutherland R.S.
        • DiSandro M.J.
        • Hayward S.W.
        • Lipschutz J.
        • Cunha G.R.
        The effect of testosterone on androgen receptors and human penile growth.
        J Urol. 1997; 158: 1113-1118