Advertisement

Comparative effectiveness of a pilot patient-centered ultrasound report in the management of hydronephrosis

Published:September 28, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.08.014

      Summary

      Purpose

      Hydronephrosis is a common pediatric abnormality and can be associated with substantial parental anxiety, especially in the prenatal period. Radiology reports contain complex content that can be difficult for lay audiences to comprehend, potentially contributing to parental distress.

      Materials and methods

      We developed and piloted a patient-centered radiology report (PCRR) for renal ultrasounds (US) in children with hydronephrosis (Figure). We obtained consensus from a multidisciplinary panel of experts regarding critical US report components. A parent focus group provided input regarding syntax and formatting of a PCRR, incorporating elements deemed valuable by the expert panel. We prospectively recruited parents of children who underwent US for hydronephrosis and randomized parents to receive either the PCRR + standard report (SR) or SR alone. Web-based surveys assessed self-efficacy and knowledge of US elements.

      Results

      Our pilot study included 20 SR patients and 24 PCRR patients, with no difference in demographic or disease characteristics between groups. Self-efficacy scores were uniformly high in both groups (p = 0.79). PCRR parents trended towards increased accuracy in identifying presence of severity (88% vs. 70%; p = 0.15) and bilaterality (67% vs. 45%; p = 0.15), with minimal difference in identifying parenchymal pathology (75% vs. 70%; p = 0.71) and bladder abnormalities (88% vs. 85%; p = 0.81). Parents were more confident in their ability to understand the PCRR (92% vs. 60%; p = 0.01).

      Conclusions

      Figure
      Graphical AbstractStudy methods.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gunn T.R.
        • Mora J.D.
        • Pease P.
        Antenatal diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities by ultrasonography after 28 weeks' gestation: incidence and outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 479-486
        • Livera L.N.
        • Brookfield D.S.
        • Egginton J.A.
        • Hawnaur J.M.
        Antenatal ultrasonography to detect fetal renal abnormalities: a prospective screening programme.
        BMJ. 1989; 298: 1421-1423
        • Sairam S.
        • Al-Habib A.
        • Sasson S.
        • Thilaganathan B.
        Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid-trimester ultrasound.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 17: 191-196
        • Furness M.E.
        Reporting obstetric ultrasound.
        Lancet. 1987; 1: 675-676
        • Griffiths D.M.
        • Gough M.H.
        Dilemmas after ultrasonic diagnosis of fetal abnormality.
        Lancet. 1985; 1: 623-624
        • Malone P.S.
        Antenatal diagnosis of renal tract anomalies: has it increased the sum of human happiness?.
        J R Soc Med. 1996; 89: 155P-158P
        • Harding L.J.
        • Malone P.S.
        • Wellesley D.G.
        Antenatal minimal hydronephrosis: is its follow-up an unnecessary cause of concern?.
        Prenat Diagn. 1999; 19: 701-705
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
        Ottawa decision support Framework: update, gaps and research priorities [internet]. Ottawa, Canada.
        2010 (Available from:)
        • Truog R.D.
        Patients and doctors–evolution of a relationship.
        New Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 581-585
        • Blumenthal D.
        • Tavenner M.
        The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records.
        New Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 501-504
        • DesRoches C.M.
        • Audet A.M.
        • Painter M.
        • Donelan K.
        Meeting meaningful use criteria and managing patient populations: a national survey of practicing physicians.
        Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 791-799
      1. Joint commission national patient safety goals hospital program. 2009 (Online publication.)
        • Keselman A.
        • Logan R.
        • Smith C.A.
        • Leroy G.
        • Zeng-Treitler Q.
        Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15: 473-483
        • Hasson F.
        • Keeney S.
        • McKenna H.
        Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.
        J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32: 1008-1015
        • Maly R.C.
        • Frank J.C.
        • Marshall G.N.
        • DiMatteo M.R.
        • Reuben D.B.
        Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI): validation of an instrument in older persons.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46: 889-894
        • ten Klooster P.M.
        • Oostveen J.C.
        • Zandbelt L.C.
        • Taal E.
        • Drossaert C.H.
        • Harmsen E.J.
        • et al.
        Further validation of the 5-item perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 87: 125-130
        • Stewart M.A.
        Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.
        CMAJ. 1995; 152: 1423-1433
        • Safran D.G.
        • Taira D.A.
        • Rogers W.H.
        • Kosinski M.
        • Ware J.E.
        • Tarlov A.R.
        Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care.
        J Fam Pract. 1998; 47: 213-220
        • Levinson W.
        • Roter D.L.
        • Mullooly J.P.
        • Dull V.T.
        • Frankel R.M.
        Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.
        JAMA. 1997; 277: 553-559
        • Bertakis K.D.
        • Azari R.
        Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization.
        J Am Board Fam Med. 2011; 24: 229-239
        • Bruno M.A.
        • Petscavage-Thomas J.M.
        • Mohr M.J.
        • Bell S.K.
        • Brown S.D.
        The “open letter”: radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 863-867
        • White S.
        • Dillow S.
        Key concepts and features of the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. NCES 2006–471.
        National Center for Education Statistics, 2005
        • Bosmans J.M.
        • Weyler J.J.
        • De Schepper A.M.
        • Parizel P.M.
        The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys.
        Radiology. 2011; 259: 184-195
        • Larson D.B.
        • Towbin A.J.
        • Pryor R.M.
        • Donnelly L.F.
        Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.
        Radiology. 2013; 267: 240-250
        • Johnson A.J.
        • Easterling D.
        • Nelson R.
        • Chen M.Y.
        • Frankel R.M.
        Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2012; 9: 256-263
        • Arnold C.W.
        • McNamara M.
        • El-Saden S.
        • Chen S.
        • Taira R.K.
        • Bui A.A.
        Imaging informatics for consumer health: towards a radiology patient portal.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: 1028-1036
        • Zanetta V.C.
        • Rosman B.M.
        • Bromley B.
        • Shipp T.D.
        • Chow J.S.
        • Campbell J.B.
        • et al.
        Variations in management of mild prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, and pediatric urologists and radiologists.
        J Urol. 2012; 188: 1935-1939
        • Nguyen H.T.
        • Benson C.B.
        • Bromley B.
        • Campbell J.B.
        • Chow J.
        • Coleman B.
        • et al.
        Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system).
        J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 982-998
        • Mossanen M.
        • Macleod L.C.
        • Chu A.
        • Wright J.L.
        • Dalkin B.
        • Lin D.W.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of a patient centered pathology report for bladder cancer care.
        J Urol. 2016; 196: 1383-1389