Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 7, Issue 1 , Pages 76.e1-76.e2, February 2011

One-stage complex primary hypospadia repair combining buccal mucosa graft, preputial flap and tunical vaginalis flap (the three-in-one technique)

  • Antonio Macedo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Riberto Liguori

      Affiliations

    • Federal University of São Paulo, Pediatric Urology Section, Rua Maestro Cardim, 560 São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Gilmar Garrone

      Affiliations

    • Federal University of São Paulo, Pediatric Urology Section, Rua Maestro Cardim, 560 São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Sérgio Ottoni

      Affiliations

    • Federal University of São Paulo, Pediatric Urology Section, Rua Maestro Cardim, 560 São Paulo, Brazil

Received 25 August 2010; accepted 16 October 2010. published online 06 December 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

Complex hypospadia repair can be performed according to different strategies, mostly in one or two stages. We present a detailed video of one patient operated according to the three-in-one technique, which combines dorsal buccal mucosa grafting for reconstruction of the incised urethral plate and a preputial flap onlay urethroplasty covered by a tunica vaginalis graft.

Method

After sectioning of the urethral plate to correct ventral curvature, the original plate is anchored to the proximal penile shaft. Buccal mucosa is harvested from the lower lip and sutured to the ventral penile shaft area. A transverse preputial flap is obtained and anastomosed ‘onlay’ to the reconstructed neouretha. The scrotal fascia is opened at the site opposite to the placement of the pedicle of the preputial flap and a careful dissection of the tunica vaginalis and cremasteric tissue is performed. This second flap is used to cover the neourethra and is fixed to the corpora by angular interrupted 6-0 PDS sutures.

Results

Our series of 35 patients resulted in 68.5% success after a single operation, whereas 31.5% needed a second repair.

Conclusion

The technique gives excellent results and can be considered an alternative to one-stage repair in primary cases.

Keywords: Hypospadia, Urethra, Reconstruction, Penile surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(10)00484-5

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.10.006

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 7, Issue 1 , Pages 76.e1-76.e2, February 2011