Open versus prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: A comparative study
Received 30 August 2009; accepted 2 February 2010. published online 08 March 2010. Corrected Proof
Abstract
Purpose
To compare the outcomes of open (OPN) and prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (PRPN) in children.
Materials and methods
The medical and radiological records of all children undergoing OPN and PRPN over a 6-year period (2002–2008) were reviewed.
Results
Thirty-nine (11 boys/28 girls) partial nephrectomies were performed in a single institution. There were 24 OPNs (15 upper, 9 lower) and 15 PRPNs (13 upper, 2 lower) with a median age at surgery of 2.3 years and 3.4 years, respectively. Median duration of surgery was 50 min (range 30–180) for the OPN and 150 min (range 70–205) for the PRPN (P < 0.001). Median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range 2–7) for the OPN and 2 days (range 1–5) for the PRPN (P < 0.001). One patient in the OPN underwent a total nephrectomy with a loss of the remaining moiety. In 20 (87%) patients of the OPN group an epidural infusion was administered and four required a morphine infusion, while only five patients in the PRPN group required a morphine infusion.
Conclusions
Open partial nephrectomy had a significantly shorter operative time, but it was associated with a longer postoperative stay and higher analgesia requirements when compared to PRPN.
ABSTRACT