Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 5, Issue 5 , Pages 378-382, October 2009

Factors affecting outcome of tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty: Single-center experience with 500 cases

Pediatric Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Received 6 August 2008; accepted 18 February 2009. published online 27 July 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

To review our experience of tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty in children with hypospadias defects.

Methods

Of 500 children (mean age 6 years) who received a TIP urethroplasty, 439 (87.8%) had primary hypospadias and 61 had one failed previous repair. The hypospadias defects were coronal in 110 (22%), distal penile in 261 (52.2%), midpenile in 78 (15.6%) and proximal in 51 (10.2%). Chordee was present in 98 (19.6%) patients. Presence of complications requiring re-operation and overall general appearance was recorded.

Results

The mean (SD, range) follow-up was 34 (18, 7–77) months. Overall success rate was 81.4%. Re-operation was required in 93 patients (18.6%); for urethrocutaneous fistula in 47 (9.4%), complete disruption of the repair in 32 (6.4%) and meatal stenosis in 14 (2.8%). In univariate analysis, complications were significantly higher in stented repairs, posterior hypospadias, those with no neourethral coverage (spongioplasty), and repairs early in the study. The last three factors were the only significant independent risk factors in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

TIP is a reliable method for treating both distal and proximal hypospadias and is suitable for both primary and re-operative cases with a low rate of complications. A significantly better outcome is achieved with distal hypospadias, covering the neourethra with the mobilized corpus spongiosum (spongioplasty) or a flap, and experience. Stenting of the repair, patient age, or previous failed repair has no statistically significant impact on outcome.

Keywords: Hypospadias, Urethral plate, Urethroplasty, Meatal stenosis, Fistula

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This paper abstract was accepted in the ESPU & AAP section on urology – 2nd joint meeting; Uppsala, Sweden in 2005. N.B. It was presented in the Hypospadias 2 session.

PII: S1477-5131(09)00275-7

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.02.204

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 5, Issue 5 , Pages 378-382, October 2009