Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 30-33 , February 2009

Are urodynamic studies really needed during bladder augmentation follow-up?

  • P. López Pereira

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, P° de la Castellana 261, Madrid 28046, Spain. Fax: +34 917277033.
    • ,
  • J.A. Moreno Valle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Adult Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain
    • ,
  • L. Espinosa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Nephrology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain
    • ,
  • J.M. Alonso Dorrego

      Affiliations

    • Department of Adult Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain
    • ,
  • M.J. Martínez Urrutia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain
    • ,
  • R. Lobato Romera

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain
    • ,
  • E. Jaureguízar Monereo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, University Hospital “La Paz”, Madrid, Spain

Received 9 June 2008 ,Accepted 14 July 2008.

References 

  1. Chartier-Kastler EJ, Mongiat-Artus P, Bitker MO, Chancellor MB, Richard F, Denys P. Long-term results of augmentation cystoplasty in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:490–494
  2. Quek ML, Ginsberg DA. Long-term urodynamics followup of bladder augmentation for neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 2003;169:195–198
  3. Hayashi Y, Yamataka A, Kaneyama K, Kato Y, Lane GJ, Miyano T. Review of 86 patients with myelodysplasia and neurogenic bladder who underwent sigmoidocolocystoplasty and were followed more than 10 years. J Urol. 2006;176:1806–1809
  4. López-Pereira P, Martínez-Urrutia MJ, Jaureguizar E. Un nuevo método para valorar la resistencia del esfinter, en pacientes con vejigas de baja acomodación. Actas Urol Esp. 1996;20:274–279
  5. Bramble FJ. The treatment of adult enuresis and urge incontinence by enterocystoplasty. BJU Int. 1982;54:693–696
  6. Mundy AR, Stephenson TP. Clam ileocystoplasty for the treatment of refractory urge incontinence. BJU Int. 1985;57:641–646
  7. Schwartz GJ, Brion LP, Spitzer A. The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1987;34:571–590
  8. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Long-term results of augmentation cystoplasty. Eur Urol. 1998;34(Suppl. 1):40–42
  9. Luangkhot R, Peng BCH, Blaivas JG. Ileocecocystoplasty for the management of refractory neurogenic bladder: surgical technique and urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1991;146:1340–1344
  10. Nasrallah PF, Alibadi HA. Bladder augmentation in patients with neurogenic bladder and vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 1991;146:563–566
  11. McInerney PD, DeSouza N, Thomas PJ, Mundy AR. The role of urodynamic studies in the evaluation of patients with augmentation cystoplasties. Br J Urol. 1995;76:475–478
  12. Herschorn S, Hewitt RJ. Patient perspective of long-term outcome of augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder. Urology. 1998;52:672–678
  13. Arikan N, Turkolmez K, Budak M, Gogus O. Outcome of augmentation sigmoidocystoplasty in children with neurogenic bladder. Urol Int. 2000;64:82–85
  14. Podesta M, Barros D, Herrera M, Castera R. Ureterocystoplasty: videourodynamic assessment. J Urol. 2006;176:1721–1725
  15. Husmann DA, Snodgrass WT, Koyle MA, Furness PD, Kropp BP, Cheng EY, et al. Ureterocystoplasty: indications for successful augmentation. J Urol. 2004;171:376–380

PII: S1477-5131(08)00350-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.07.006

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages 30-33 , February 2009

Article Tools