Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 341-344, October 2008

Endoscopic Deflux® injection for pediatric transplant reflux: A feasible alternative to open ureteral reimplant

  • Mark A. Williams

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology (MW and DG), University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Division of Pediatric Urology, 770 Estate Place, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, USA.
  • ,
  • Dana W. Giel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology (MW and DG), University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA
  • ,
  • M. Colleen Hastings

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology (MH), University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA

Received 8 February 2008; accepted 10 April 2008. published online 16 June 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

Pediatric renal transplantation is frequently performed using a freely refluxing vesicoureteral anastomosis. The resulting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) may increase the morbidity of urinary tract infections (UTIs) that commonly occur in this setting, yet open surgical correction of the refluxing anastomosis can prove difficult. We report our experience using endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Deflux®) to correct transplant VUR.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients treated with endoscopic injection of Deflux (Q-Med, Uppsala, Sweden) for VUR into their renal allograft. Indications for inclusion in the study were renal allograft transplantation for primary end-stage renal disease, radiographically proven VUR into the allograft, normal voiding history, and at least one documented febrile UTI. Preoperative and postoperative images, including voiding cystourethrogram and allograft ultrasound, were compared. Location of the transplant orifice and volume of Deflux were recorded. Clinical outcomes, including documented UTI and changes in serum creatinine following treatment, were also assessed.

Results

Eight patients were identified who were treated for transplant VUR, with a total of nine transplant ureters injected. Mean patient age at time of injection was 11.6 years (range: 7–19 years). Post-injection voiding cystourethrograms and allograft ultrasound were available for all patients. Following treatment, four ureters demonstrated resolution of VUR and one ureter demonstrated improvement to grade 1 VUR. The remaining four ureters demonstrated no change in VUR grade. No patients showed any change in their serum creatinine, and no episodes of transplant pyelonephritis have occurred during the follow-up period. Mean post-injection follow-up has been 17.3 months (range 9–26 months).

Conclusion

Initial results demonstrate that endoscopic treatment with Deflux is feasible and may provide a less invasive alternative for treatment of transplant VUR. Further investigation with a larger group of patients and longer follow-up is needed.

Keywords: Vesicoureteral reflux, Pyelonephritis, Kidney transplantation, Endoscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(08)00293-3

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.04.003

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 341-344, October 2008