Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 8-13 , February 2008

Bladder augmentation and artificial sphincter implantation: Urodynamic behavior and effects on continence

Received 12 December 2006 ,Accepted 28 February 2007.

References 

  1. Studer UE, Ackermann D, Casanova GA, Zingg EJ. A newer form of bladder substitute based on historical perspectives. Semin Urol. 1988;6:57–65
  2. Rogers E, Scardino PT. A simple ileal substitute bladder after radical cystectomy: experience with a modification of the Studer pouch. J Urol. 1995;153:1432–1438
  3. Hinman J. Selection of intestinal segments for bladder substitution: physical and physiological characteristics. J Urol. 1988;139:519–523
  4. Schmidbauer CP. Mechanics and neurophysiology of intestinal segments as bowel substitutes: An editorial comment. J Urol. 1987;138:1438–1439
  5. Landau EH, Churchill BM, Jayanthi VR, Gilmour RF, Steckler RE, McLoire GA, et al. The sensitivity of pressure specific bladder volume versus total bladder capacity as a measure of bladder storage dysfunction. J Urol. 1994;152:1578–1581
  6. Kaefer M, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, Retik AB, Peters CA, Atala A, et al. Estimating normal bladder capacity in children. J Urol. 1997;158:2261–2264
  7. Koff SA. Guidelines to determine the size and shape of intestinal segments used for reconstruction. J Urol. 1988;140:1150–1151
  8. Rodó J. Comportamiento urodinámico de la vejiga ampliada. Rev Cir Infantil. 2000;10:144–150
  9. Goldwasser B, Barrett DM, Webster GD, Kramer SA. Cystometric properties of ileum and right colon after bladder augmentation, substitution or replacement. J Urol. 1987;138:1007–1008
  10. Sidi AA, Reinberg R, Gonzalez R. Influence of intestinal segment and configuration on the outcome of augmentation enterocystoplasty. J Urol. 1986;136:1201–1204
  11. Reddy PK, Lange PH, Fraley EE. Total bladder replacement using detubularized sigmoid colon: technique and results. J Urol. 1991;145:51–55
  12. Lytton B, Green DF. Urodynamic studies in patients undergoing bladder replacement surgery. J Urol. 1989;141:1394–1397
  13. Goldwasser B, Rife CC, Benson RC, Furlow WI, Barrett DM. Urodynamic evaluation of patients after the Camey operation. J Urol. 1987;138:832–835
  14. Berglund B, Kock NG, Norlén L, Philipson BM. Volume capacity and pressure characteristics of the continent ileal reservoir used for urinary diversion. J Urol. 1987;137:29–34
  15. Decter RM, Bauer SB, Mandell J, Colodny AH, Retik AB. Small bowel augmentation in children with neurogenic bladder: an initial report of urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1987;138:1014–1016
  16. Pope JC, Keating MA, Casale AJ, Rink RC. Augmenting the augmented bladder: treatment of the contractile bowel segment. J Urol. 1998;160:854–857
  17. Landau EH, Jayanthi VR, Khoury AE, Churchill BM, Gilmour RF, Steckler RE, et al. Bladder augmentation: ureterocystoplasty versus ileocystoplasty. J Urol. 1994;152:716–719
  18. Churchill BM, Aliabadi H, Landau EH, McLoire GA, Steckler RE, McKenna PH, et al. Ureteral bladder augmentation. J Urol. 1993;160:716–720
  19. Adams MC, Brock JW, Pope JC, Rink RC. Ureterocystoplasty: is it necessary to detubularize the distal ureter?. J Urol. 1998;160:851–853

PII: S1477-5131(07)00279-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.02.009

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 8-13 , February 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution