Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Supplement 1 , Pages S16-S17, April 2007

Bladder function after endoscopic instillation of deflux® - A prospective study

General University Hospital and 1st Medical School, Department of Urology, Prague 2, CZECH REPUBLIC - ∗ General University Hospital and 1st Medical School, Department of Urology, Prague 2, CZECH REPUBLIC - † General University Hospital and 1st Medical School, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Prague 2, CZECH REPUBLIC

published online 12 March 2007.

# S01-4 (O)

PURPOSE

In view of possible injury to bladder function in association with the open antireflux procedure, the influence of endoscopic instillation of Deflux® was evaluated in a prospective randomised study. Supported by grant IGA MZCR 8021-3.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2006, 37 children with primary vesicoureteral reflux grade III-V were randomly assigned into two groups: 21children (15 girls, 6 boys) aged 7-39 months (mean 20.3) were operated on by the instillation of Deflux® - Group A; 16 children (8 girls, 8 boys) aged 1-47 months (mean 15.1) treated conservatively by antibiotics – Group B. During follow-up of 4 to 47 months (mean 18.1), repeated ultrasound and videourodynamic investigations were performed. Antibiotic treatment was stopped after the disappearance of reflux. Clinical data taken from parents (voiding habits, incontinence, urinary stream, straining or pain during micturition), and urodynamic data – capacity, intravesical pressure and residuals were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the Group A, one 3.5 year-old girl suffered from postoperative worsening of incontinence without urodynamic pathology, in a 4-year-old boy, detrusor hyperactivity without clinical symptoms was detected and one 3-year-old girl suffered from pyelonephritis due to a temporary obstructive megaureter after instillation. In Group B, interrupted voiding in one 4.3-year-old girl was reported, and in another 4-year-old boy with persistent night-time incontinence bladder hyperactivity was detected. Four children suffered from urinary tract infection (febrile in three).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic instillation of Deflux® was not associated with any damage to bladder function in comparison with the conservatively treated patients during midterm follow-up.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(07)00011-3

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.01.006

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Supplement 1 , Pages S16-S17, April 2007