Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Pages 295-300, August 2007

Urodynamic changes in patients with anterior urethral valves: Before and after endoscopic valve ablation

Pediatric Urology Research Center, Department of Urology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Received 11 September 2006; accepted 1 November 2006. published online 29 January 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

To retrospectively review a series of children with anterior urethral valves (AUV), with emphasis on patterns of urodynamic change and long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the medical records of eight patients who had undergone thorough radiological and urodynamic exams before and after treatment. The diagnosis of AUV was based on radiological imaging and confirmed by urethrocystoscopy. The valves were ablated through either transurethral fulguration or resection. The upper urinary tracts were studied by renal scan and ultrasonography before and after the procedure. Bladder function was assessed urodynamically 3months after surgery. Uroflowmetry was performed as soon as the children were toilet trained.

Results

Endoscopic ablation of AUV was successful in all cases and no surgical complications occurred. The initial symptoms resolved in all boys. VUR disappeared in two out of three patients, and five children had bladder trabeculation that was resolved after surgery. The final outcome was successful in seven patients (88%). The major urodynamic dysfunction was bladder hypercontractility that resolved following valve ablation. The mean maximum voiding detrusor pressure (Pdetmax) decreased from 213.2±17.9cmH2O to 80.7±9.9cmH2O, 6months after treatment (P<0.001). None of the patients had low-compliant bladder, detrusor instability or myogenic failure. The voiding pattern in all toilet-trained patients was staccato and of an interrupted shape prior to surgery, but changed to a normal bell-shaped voiding pattern following valve ablation.

Conclusion

AUV should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with infravesical obstruction. We recommend endoscopic valve ablation as the treatment of choice.

Keywords: Urodynamic, Uroflowmetry, Anterior urethral valves, Posterior urethral valves, Endoscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(06)00217-8

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.11.002

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 4 , Pages 295-300, August 2007