Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 200-205, June 2007

An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Medical Faculty of Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey

Received 16 June 2006; accepted 4 August 2006. published online 25 October 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

We present our alternative hydronephrosis grading system (AGS) in an attempt to establish optimal treatment guidelines, and clarify and refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis in neonates.

Patients and methods

A total of 162 newborns (228 affected kidneys) with antenatally diagnosed primary ureteropelvic junction-type hydronephrosis were prospectively followed and treated by the same surgeon for a mean of 46 (6–65) months. Ultrasonography and diuretic renogram were used for diagnosis and follow up. Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grading system, anteroposterior diameter of renal pelvis (APDRP) and our AGS were used to determine the degree of hydronephrosis. AGS: 0, no hydronephrosis; 1, dilatation of renal pelvis alone; 2, plus caliceal dilatation; 3, plus <1/2 (mild-to-moderate) renal parenchymal loss; 4, plus >1/2 (severe) renal parenchymal loss (cyst-like kidney with no visually significant renal parenchyma).

Results

On the first postnatal ultrasound, the severity of hydronephrosis was SFU2 in 152 kidneys (surgery, 0%), SFU-3 in 41 kidneys (surgery, 19.5%) and SFU-4 in 35 kidneys (surgery, 68.6%). The follow up, treatment and outcome of SFU-1 and SFU-2 patients were similar; all resolved spontaneously without renal deterioration (renal function >40%). Renal function ranged between 7% and 39% in SFU-4 patients. Intrarenal pelvis was found in one patient with an APDRP of <15mm, seven patients of 16–30mm, and five patients of >30mm. Overall, 201 hydronephrotic kidneys (88.2%) resolved spontaneously while 27 (11.8%) required pyeloplasty.

Conclusion

Neither an SFU grading system nor measurement of APDRP is the gold standard in determining the severity of hydronephrosis. Both methods may fail, particularly in children with intrarenal pelvis configuration or SFU-4 hydronephrosis. Our AGS promises easier follow up and more timely treatment.

Keywords: Children, Hydronephrosis, Grading, Follow up, Treatment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(06)00159-8

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.08.002

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 200-205, June 2007