Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 209-213, June 2007

A prospective randomized trial of the effect of a soluble adhesive on the ease of dressing removal following hypospadias repair

  • Caroline Sanders

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust (Alder Hey), Eaton Rd, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 0151 252 5434; fax: +44 0151 228 2024.
  • ,
  • Andrea Young

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust (Alder Hey), Eaton Rd, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
  • ,
  • Helen F. McAndrew

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Urology, Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust (Alder Hey), Eaton Rd, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
  • ,
  • Simon E. Kenny

      Affiliations

    • Department of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Received 23 May 2006; accepted 18 August 2006. published online 14 December 2006.

Abstract 

Aim

To determine whether the use of a novel dressing removal technique resulted in shorter removal times, reduced the child's experience of pain and/or reduced parental anxiety when compared to a standard approach.

Methods

This prospective unblinded randomized controlled trial of 53 consecutive boys undergoing primary hypospadias repair was powered using data from a prior feasibility study. Children were randomized to a standard control dressing (A) or standard dressing plus Cavilon™ (B) group. Removal was by (A) soaking the child and dressing in the bath or (B) application of an adhesive remover to the dressing. The primary outcome measure was dressing removal time. Secondary measures were: child pain scores on a visual analogue scale measured by the parent and nurse, and parental anxiety using the self-evaluative state anxiety measure. Data are expressed as median (range); P<0.05 is significant.

Results

Dressing B was significantly quicker to remove than A: B 30min (5–86min) vs A 40min (17–105min), P=0.01, Mann–Whitney. No differences in parent/nurse pain scores between the two groups were seen. There was a strong correlation between parent and nurse reporting of pain scores at the time of dressing removal (Spearman 0.79, P<0.000). No significant differences in pre- and post-dressing removal parental anxiety scores were seen (P=0.159, Mann–Whitney). Several parents had high anxiety levels at both times.

Conclusion

The novel dressing removal approach (B) was significantly shorter than the standard one (A). There were no significant differences in child's pain or parental anxiety score between the two approaches.

Keywords: Hypospadias, Dressing removal, Nursing care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(06)00157-4

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.08.006

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 209-213, June 2007