Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 53-57, February 2007

Diagnosis of ectopic ureter as a cause of urinary incontinence

  • Gregory R. Hanson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA
  • ,
  • John M. Gatti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Urology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
    • Department of Urology, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA
  • ,
  • George K. Gittes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Urology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
  • ,
  • J. Patrick Murphy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Urology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
    • Department of Urology, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Urology, Children's Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. Tel.: +1 816 234 7002.

Received 4 January 2005; accepted 7 June 2005.

Abstract 

Introduction and objective

Female pediatric patients with continuous drip incontinence present a diagnostic challenge. At times, these symptoms may be due to an ectopic ureter inserting below the external sphincter. The evaluation may consist an ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), but these may not be diagnostic and further evaluation may be necessary. We reviewed our experience with imaging modalities used to make the diagnosis of ureteral ectopia.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 24 female patients with incontinence after toilet training or other symptoms caused by ureteral ectopia. We focused on the initial imaging methods, the modality providing the definitive diagnosis, and outcome.

Results

Twenty-four patients were identified with an ectopic ureter. Two patients had bilateral ectopia for a total of 26 ectopic ureters. Of the 24 patients, 19 initially had negative diagnostic tests. These combined tests consisted of 15 intravenous pyelograms (IVPs), 18 VCUGs, 14 ultrasound, five cystoscopies, one nuclear VCUG and one MRI. Two patients underwent computed tomography (CT) as the primary test revealing an ectopic system. Of the 26 ectopic ureters, the diagnosis was made by CT scan in 13, IVP in five, cystoscopy in six, and ultrasound in one. One ectopic ureter was identified by exploration. In no cases did a CT scan fail to identify an ectopic system.

Conclusion

Patients with an ectopic ureter often will have no abnormality on initial imaging studies. Our experience has shown that a CT scan with delayed contrast is the most sensitive, economic and readily available test for diagnosing ecoptic ureters and renal systems.

Keywords: Ureter, Ectopic, Urinary incontinence, Computed tomography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(06)00010-6

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.06.009

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 53-57, February 2007