Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 178-181, June 2006

Reimplantation of obstructive megaureters with and without tailoring

  • D. Ben-Meir

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Monash Medical Center, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • N. McMullin

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Monash Medical Center, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • C. Kimber

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
    • Department of Pediatric Surgery, Monash Medical Center, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • S. Gibikote

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • ,
  • K. Kongola

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • ,
  • J.M. Hutson

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9345 5805; fax: +61 3 9345 7997.

Received 10 May 2005; accepted 10 May 2005.

Abstract 

Objectives

Reimplantation of megaureters may be complicated by excessive bulk of tissue when plicated, or stenosis at the anastomosis site when excisional tapering is performed. Some urologists in our institution reimplant megaureters without tailoring, while others routinely tailor megaureters. Aiming to compare success rates, we report our experience in reimplanting obstructive megaureters with and without tailoring.

Materials

The medical records of 30 boys and four girls with primary obstructive megaureters (a total of 38 ureters) were reviewed. Median age at operation was 18 months (range 1 month to 8 years). Of the ureters, 16/38 were tailored and 22/38 were reimplanted without tailoring.

Results

Preoperative mean diameter (per ultrasound) of the 16 tailored ureters was 16.1mm (range 10–26mm). Postoperative ultrasound showed resolution of hydronephrosis in 3/16 (19%), an improvement in 11/16 (69%), and no change in the degree of hydronephrosis in 2/16 (13%). Preoperative mean diameter of the non-tailored ureters was 14mm (range 10–27mm), and postoperative ultrasound showed resolution of hydronephrosis in 11/22 (50%), an improvement in 10/22 (45%), and no change in the degree of hydronephrosis in 1/22 (5%). Of the tailored ureters, 1/16 needed re-operation because of anastomotic stricture, and one girl had recurrent urinary tract infections. Of the non-tailored ureters, four had recurrent infection, of whom one boy underwent redo reimplantation because of grade 2 vesicoureteric reflux.

Conclusion

In this series non-tailoring reimplantation was an equivalent option to tailoring in obstructive megaureters.

Keywords: Primary obstructive megaureter, Tapering, Plication, Non-tailoring

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(05)00122-1

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.05.010

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 178-181, June 2006