Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 31-36, February 2005

The place of pelvic osteotomy in the modern era of bladder exstrophy reconstruction

  • A.D. Baird

      Affiliations

    • Division of Paediatric Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Marburg 146, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
  • ,
  • P.D. Sponseller

      Affiliations

    • Division of Paediatric Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Marburg 146, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
    • Division of Orthopedics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • ,
  • J.P. Gearhart

      Affiliations

    • Division of Paediatric Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Marburg 146, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 410 955 5358; fax: +1 410 955 0833.

Received 18 June 2004; received in revised form 16 July 2004; accepted 29 September 2004.

Abstract 

Background

The place of pelvic osteotomy in reconstructing bladder/cloacal exstrophy has been debated for some time; the experience with ‘combined’ osteotomy in primary and re-operative exstrophy closure at this institution is presented, with a discussion of the historical and scientific place of osteotomy in managing this condition.

Patients and methods

Sixty-eight patients had bilateral vertical and transverse iliac osteotomy between 1992 and 2003, and with outcome data available. Of 58 patients with classic exstrophy, eight were newborns, eight were deliberately delayed primary closures, 36 were re-operative after previous failed closure and six were bladder neck reconstructions where the bladder outlet was very wide, such that bony closure was felt necessary for successful bladder neck coaptation. Of 10 patients with cloacal exstrophy, nine were primary closures and one was a re-operative closure. Data were collected relating to age at closure, complications and continence outcome.

Results

The mean (range) age (months) was 41 (5–179) for re-operative closures, 12.5 (3–32) for delayed primary closures, 64.1 (38–79) for bladder neck reconstruction, 51.4 (6–165) for cloacal exstrophy closure, and 15 (2–45) days for newborn exstrophy closure. There was a superficial wound infection in two patients, pin-site infection in one, loose pins in two, and two had transient femoral nerve palsy. In two patients the procedure failed and they required further re-operative closure with osteotomy. Sixteen patients are dry urethrally day and night, 12 have had and four are awaiting bladder augmentation, one has a colon conduit, and 35 are awaiting a definitive continence procedure.

Conclusions

Osteotomy has a proven track record in the field of exstrophy reconstruction, and the benefit especially in re-operative closure is emphasized by the present results. The surgical morbidity with the ‘combined osteotomy’ is low, cosmetic results are excellent and the effect on success of closure is clearly advantageous.

Keywords: Pelvic osteotomy, Reconstruction, Bladder/cloacal exstrophy, Children

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(04)00007-5

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2004.09.001

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 31-36, February 2005