Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 5, Issue 6 , Pages 490-494, December 2009

Trends in prenatal sonography use and subsequent urologic diagnoses and abortions in the United States

  • Michael H. Hsieh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 650 721 1301; fax: +1 650 723 4055.
  • ,
  • Julie Lai

      Affiliations

    • RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
    • Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • ,
  • Christopher S. Saigal

      Affiliations

    • RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
    • Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • ,
  • the Urologic Diseases in America Project

Received 1 May 2009; accepted 1 July 2009. published online 07 August 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

Prenatal sonography has enabled fetal diagnosis of urologic conditions and is now commonly used in the US. The impact of this technology on the incidence of pediatric urological diagnoses is unknown. We sought to assess trends in prenatal sonography and resulting urologic diagnoses and/or abortions.

Methods

Using administrative codes in Ingenix, a claims database of individuals with employer-based insurance, we identified women undergoing prenatal ultrasounds (1998–2005). These were linked to claims for subsequent abortions, live births, and postnatal urologic diagnoses in resulting offspring.

Results

99.07% of women underwent ultrasound and childbirth. Ultrasound use among women whose pregnancies proceeded to birth increased from 90,568 to 96,866 per 100,000 mother–infant pairs from 1998 to 2005. Of women who did or did not undergo ultrasounds, 1.25% and 0.66% had infants with urologic diagnoses, respectively. The rates of prenatal ultrasound-detected urinary tract anomalies increased from 1032.26 per 100,000 live births in 1999 to 1225.71 per 100,000 live births in 2005.

Conclusions

Prenatal ultrasound is widely used, but increased utilization of this diagnostic modality did not seem to be associated with abortions. The rate of pediatric urologic diagnoses in infants who had received prenatal ultrasound did not rise significantly over time.

Keywords: Ultrasonography, prenatal, Urologic diseases, Abortion, induced

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1477-5131(09)00396-9

doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.07.002

Journal of Pediatric Urology
Volume 5, Issue 6 , Pages 490-494, December 2009